Shakti Travel and Tours vs State Of Bihar And Anr.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
28 April, 2000·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. Accused who is the Appellant, assails the order of the High Court refusing to quash the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The only ground on which the learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for quashing of the complaint ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Debika Guha And Ors.
Judges: S R Babu, S Phukan
28 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The grievance before us in this appeal is in relation to an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench holding that substitute Extra Departmental Agents of the Postal Department who have worked for 180 days or more in one calendar year continuously can cl...
Supreme Court Of India
News Item "Hindustan Times" ... vs Central Pollution Control Board ...
Judges: B Kirpal, S S Quadri
28 April, 2000·1. Despite order of 13th September, 1999 having been passed requiring stoppage of industrial effluent which did not conform to the parameters prescribed by the C.P.C.B. being discharged into the river Yamuna directly or indirectly, nothing appears to have been done except issuance of few notices in ...
Supreme Court Of India
J. Lingaiah And Ors. vs G. Hanumanthappa And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, Y Sabharwal
28 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the Appellants and learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 who are the contesting Respondents finally in this appeal.3. Respondent No. 5 who is a contesting Respondent though served, has not thought it fit to appear and contest the p...
Supreme Court Of India
Dy. Dir. Gen. Of Geo. Survey Of ... vs R. Yadaiah And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
28 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, which was affirmed by the High Court by dismissing the Writ Petition filed against the said order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal followed the earlier decision of the Cuttack Bench...
Supreme Court Of India
Govt Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors vs Gudepu Sailoo & Ors
Judges: D P Wadhwa, S S Ahamad
28 April, 2000·PETITIONER:GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:GUDEPU SAILOO & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/2000 BENCH:D.P.Wadhwa, S.S.Ahamad JUDGMENT:S.SAGHIR AHMAD, J. Leave granted. On 21.10.1961, each of the respondents was allotted an area of 7.06 acres of Government land situated in village Manch...
Supreme Court Of India
Liaq Ahmed & Ors vs Shri Habeeb-Ur-Rehman
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, R P Sethi
28 April, 2000·CASE NO.:Special Leave Petition (civil) 10641 of 1999 PETITIONER:LIAQ AHMED & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI HABEEB-UR-REHMAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/2000 BENCH:S. Saghir Ahmad & R.P. Sethi.JUDGMENT:SETHI,J.Leave granted. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J Rent control legilsations ...
Supreme Court Of India
Suraj Parkash Gupta And Others vs State Of J & K And Others
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, A P Misra
28 April, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3034 of 2000 PETITIONER:SURAJ PARKASH GUPTA AND OTHERS RESPONDENT:STATE OF J & K AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/2000 BENCH:M. JAGANNADHA RAO & A.P. MISRA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (3) SCR 807 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. Leave granted in a...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Committee, Mansa, ... vs Darshan Singh And Ors.
Judges: V Khare, S Phukan
27 April, 2000·ORDER V.N. Khare, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties.2. The Respondent herein was appointed as a Driver on a fixed salary of Rs. 80/per month on 17th July, 1954. The Appellant Municipal Committee approved the said appointment on 16th September, 1954. It is alleged that with effect from 1st February,...
Supreme Court Of India
Ajay Singh vs State Of Bihar
Judges: G Pattanaik, S Variava
27 April, 2000·1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment of the Patna High Court in dismissing the Criminal Appeal No. 351/1994 and convicting the appellants under Section 302, I.P.C. for having caused the murder of one Siaram. The prosecution case in nutshell is that the two accused appellants came i...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.