M/S Arosan Enterprises Ltd vs Union Of India & Anr
Judges: B N Kirpal, Umesh C Banerjee
16 September, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S. AROSAN ENTERPRISES LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/09/1999 BENCH:B.N.Kirpal, Umesh C. Banerjee JUDGMENT:BANERJEE,J.These two Appeals by the grant of Special Leave and arising out of the Judgment of the Delhi High Court focus two singularly singular ques...
Supreme Court Of India
Sube Singh Bahmani And Ors vs State Of Haryana
Judges: G B Pattanaik, S P Kurdukar, K Venkataswami
16 September, 1999·PETITIONER:SUBE SINGH BAHMANI AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF HARYANA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/09/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, S.P.Kurdukar, K.Venkataswami JUDGMENT:M.JAGANNADHA RAO,J.Leave granted in special leave petitions. These three appeals arise out of the dispute between general candidates and res...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Tapas D Neogy
Judges: G B Pattanaik, N S Hedge
16 September, 1999·PETITIONER:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RESPONDENT:TAPAS D. NEOGY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/09/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, N.S. Hedge JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK, J.Leave granted.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.4.97 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No. 8...
Supreme Court Of India
Yoginath D Bagde vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K Vankataswami
16 September, 1999·PETITIONER:YOGINATH D. BAGDE Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/09/1999 BENCH:S.Saghir Ahmad, K.Vankataswami JUDGMENT:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J.The appellant has approached this Court against the judgment and order dated 21.6.1996 passed by the Bombay High Court which had dism...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramesh S/O Laxman Gavli vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik, N Santosh Hegde
16 September, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(2) SCR 603 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATTANAIK J. These two appeals, one by the convict, Ramesh and the other by the State are directed against one and the same judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh and were, therefore, heard together and are disposed of by...
Supreme Court Of India
Hareram Pandey vs Ajit Chaudhary
Judges: A A S, S R Babu, R Lahoti
16 September, 1999·1. The appellant was a candidate sponsored by the Indian National Congress in the elections to the Bihar Legislative Assembly from 218. Brahampur Assembly Constituency held in 1995. The respondent, a candidate sponsored by the Janata Dal was declared elected, defeating the appellant by a margin of 2...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Ram Prasad Etc Etc vs Shri D K Vijay And Ors Etc Etc
Judges: K Venkataswami, G B Pattanaik, M Jagnnadha Rao, S P Kurdukar
16 September, 1999·PETITIONER:SHRI RAM PRASAD ETC.ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI D.K.VIJAY AND ORS.ETC.ETC. .. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/09/1999 BENCH:K.Venkataswami, G.B.Pattanaik, M.Jagnnadha Rao, S.P.Kurdukar JUDGMENT:M. JAGANNADHA RAO Leave granted in the special leave petitions. All the Civil Appeals arise out of the judgm...
Supreme Court Of India
Kikiben and Ors vs Balvantlal Shivlal (Dead) By Lrs. ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, D Wadhwa
15 September, 1999·1. Application for substitution is allowed.2. These appeals are preferred against the common judgment and order of the Gujarat High Court in First Appeal Nos. 387/77 and 388/77 dated 12.10.1984. The appellants are the defendants in the original suit. The respondents-plaintiffs preferred spl. civil s...
Supreme Court Of India
Banobi and Anr. vs State Of Maharashtra and Ors.
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
15 September, 1999·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellants are challenging in this appeal, their conviction under Section 21 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. They have been convicted for keeping charas in their possession without any licence or permit. Appellant No. 1 has been convicted also un...
Supreme Court Of India
Sarjudas and Anr. vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
15 September, 1999·1. Both the appellants have been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS and Section 66(1)(b) and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act as, they were found in possession of charas weighing 7 kgs. and 419 grams without any licence or permit.2. Various contentions regarding nonobservance of mandatory...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.