Kamaksha Rai & Ors vs State Of U P
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, G B Pattaniak
01 October, 1999·PETITIONER:KAMAKSHA RAI & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/10/1999 BENCH:N.Santosh Hegde, G.B.Pattaniak JUDGMENT:SANTOSH HEGDE, J.These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 22.12.1993 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.2803/78. T...
Supreme Court Of India
Sukhar vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: G B Pattanaik, M Srinivasan, N S Heger
01 October, 1999·PETITIONER: SUKHAR Vs.RESPONDENT:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/10/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, M.Srinivasan, N.S.Heger JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK, J.The appellant stood charged for the offence under Section 307 IPC for causing injury to Nakkal on 17.4.78 at 7.30 a.m. near the Chak in village T...
Supreme Court Of India
Damodar vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G B Pattanaik, N Santosh Hegde
01 October, 1999·PETITIONER: DAMODAR Vs.RESPONDENT:STATE OF KARNATAKA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/10/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, N.Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:SANTOSH HEGDE, J.The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the XXII City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in SC No.337/91 vide his judgment ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Jaiswal Chemicals P. Ltd.
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
01 October, 1999·ORDER C.A. Nos. 5671-72 of 1999 at S.L.P. (C.) Nos. 8892-93 of 1999 :1. Leave granted. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, in our opinion, questions of law did arise. We, therefore, allow this appeal and direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following two questions of law ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.