Jeet Mohinder Singh vs Harminder Singh Jassi
Judges: Dr A S Cji, S Rajendra Babu, R C Lahoti
26 October, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(4) SCR 33 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.C. LAHOTI, J. This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 preferred by the appellant (petitioner before the High Court) feeling aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Designated Electio...
Supreme Court Of India
Computwel Systems P. Ltd. vs W. Hasan And Anr.
Judges: B Kirpal, M Srinivasan, N S Hegde
26 October, 1999·ORDER W. Hasan, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Order of assessment was passed in the case of the petitioner on January 12, 1996, under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Under the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, a Scheme known as Kar Vivad Samadhan was promulgated. The persons could avail of the be...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, M Rao, V Khare
26 October, 1999·1. We have heard the learned Attorney General. We are in no doubt that by the order dated 4th November, 1978 rebate was finally allowed and not on a provisional basis. To rebate that was finally allowed, the provisions of the trade notice subsequently issued, on 11th January, 1979, would have no app...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Gayatri Glass Works
Judges: S Bharucha, M Rao, V Khare
26 October, 1999·1. We are concerned with the period 1st March, 1979 to 1st March, 1980. During that period Item 23A of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, relating to glass and glassware, read : "... (4) other glass and glassware including tableware ....Thirty-five per cent ad valorem". Pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sardar Arjun Singh Ahluwalia ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, M, Jagannadha Rao, V N Khare
26 October, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(4) SCR 135 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.P. BHARUCHA, J. The questions that were the subject matter of the impugned order of the High Court read thus:"(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances, the tribunal is justified in law in holding that the income of a...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhor Industries Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: Dr A S Cj, S Rajendra Babu, R C Lahoti
26 October, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(4) SCR 132 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The appellant, a manufacturer of Laminated Textile Fabrics, filed Classification List No. 1/86 for `waste side strips and scrap' for approval as non-excisable items on the ground that there was no Entry dealing with waste ...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Polyset Corporation
Judges: M J Rao, S Bharucha, V Khare
26 October, 1999·ORDER S.P. Bharucha, M. Jagannadha Rao and V.N. Khare, JJ.1. These appeals are by the Revenue against an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The goods in question are articles of plastic. They were at all relevant times excisable goods, but when they were manufactured...
Supreme Court Of India
Krishna Mohini vs Mohinder Nath Sofat
Judges: Dr A S Cji, S Rajendra Babu, R C Lahoti
26 October, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(4) SCR 76 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.C. LAHOTI, J. This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 preferred by a candidate, who, though successful at the polls, has lost in the election petition before the High Court. For the s...
Supreme Court Of India
Polar Industries Ltd. vs The Commissioner Of Central ...
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
25 October, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the High Court was justified in calling upon the assessee to deposit a sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- while the assessee's appeal is pending before the appellate authority. Be it be stated that the Assistant Commissioner raised ...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab National Bank vs D.M. Amarnath
Judges: M Rao, A Misra
25 October, 1999·ORDER M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Heard counsel on both sides.2. Leave granted.3. The respondent was an employee in the appellant Bank. On the basis of certain alleged misconduct on the part of the respondent, he was placed under suspension by order dated April 19, 1996, by the competent authority in te...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.