Gurmit Kaur And Anr. vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, R Sethi
07 May, 1999·1. Service is deemed to be effected on respondent No. 3 who is the driver of respondents 1 and 2, in view of the office report.2. Special leave granted.3. Heard both sides.4. The employer of the deceased has given evidence to the effect that he operates Punjab Tourism Taxi Service as proprietor. He ...
Supreme Court Of India
Munir Alam vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: Dr A S C J, M Jagannadha Rao, N Santosh Hegde
07 May, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (2) SCR 1209 The following Order of the Court was delivered ;On the night intervening 1st and 2nd October, 1996, in the vicinity of the Lodge of the Vice-Chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University, firing took place in which Nadeem Alam, 20 years old son of the petitioner was killed. A form...
Supreme Court Of India
B.R. Enterprises Etc, Etc vs State Of U.P. And Grs. Etc: Etc
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
07 May, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (2) SCR 1111 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MISRA, J. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for vending their grievances ...
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman, Bihar Rajya Vidyut ... vs Chhathu Ram And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, R Sethi
07 May, 1999·ORDER Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard both sides.3. The respondent had applied for appointment on compassionate grounds. He claimed that he was the adopted son of a deceased employee Bansrajia Devi who had died on 6-9-1989. Learned Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the petition...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajasthan Polymers And Resins ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: S V Manohar, R Sethi
07 May, 1999·1. Heard both sides.2. The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal for considering the combined effect of the relevant Rules 57G and 57GG in the light of the fact in the present case and in the light of the fact that the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry was in fact...
Supreme Court Of India
Prakash Chand Gupta vs K.S. Gupta
Judges: S Ahmed, S R Babu
07 May, 1999·ORDER Rajendra Babu, J.1. Leave granted.2. An application Under Section 14-C of the Delhi Rent Control Act [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the appellant on the ground that he retired from government service on February 28, 1997 and he had to vac...
Supreme Court Of India
Chanan Singh and Sons vs Collector Central Excise And Ors.
Judges: K Venkataswami, R Sethi
06 May, 1999·ORDER K. Venkataswami and R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. None appears for the appellant.2. This appeal by special leave is preferred against an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No. 5781/86, dated February 6, 1987. The appellant challenged before the High Court an order of the Tribunal allowing t...
Supreme Court Of India
Morena Mandal S.S.K. Ltd. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Judges: V Khare, U C Banerjee
06 May, 1999·ORDER V.N. Khare, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the civil revision filed by the appellant herein. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as under The appellant herein is a cooperative society. In the year 1969, the appellant decided t...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhiraj Kulshreshta vs Rajasthan High Court And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, K Thomas
06 May, 1999·1. The appellant has been convicted under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in a suo motu proceedings initiated by the Rajasthan High Court for having published an article "Adaalat Katghare Main" in a monthly magazine Maya.2. The High Court under the judgment in appeal having held t...
Supreme Court Of India
Nawab Singh vs Inderjit Kaur
Judges: S Bharucha, R Lahoti
06 May, 1999·ORDER R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant has filed a suit for permanent preventive injunction restraining the defendant - respondent from interfering with the possession of the appellant. The appellant alleges himself to be a tenant in the suit shop inducted by the defendant - responde...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.