M/S Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd , Yamunanagar,Haryana vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax , Haryana , Rohtak
Judges: R C Lahoti, S P Bharucha, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
10 March, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S.SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD.,YAMUNANAGAR,HARYANA Vs. RESPONDENT:THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HARYANA, ROHTAK DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/03/1999 BENCH:R C Lahoti, S P Bharucha, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JUDGMENT:Bharucha, J.Under appeal are the judgments and orders of Division Be...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Saketh India Limited And Others vs M/S India Securities Limited
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
10 March, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S. SAKETH INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. INDIA SECURITIES LIMITED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/03/1999 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT:Shah, J, Leave granted. The short question involved in these appeals is whether the complaint filed by the respondent under Section 138 of t...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S.Saraswati Industrial ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: R C Lahoti, S P Bharucha, Syed Shah Quadri
10 March, 1999·Bharucha, J.Under appeal are the judgments and orders of Division Benches of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The assessment years involved are Assessment Years 1970-71 to 1977-78. The High Court answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue the following question :Whether on the facts and...
Supreme Court Of India
Oberoi Hotel Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: S P Bharucha, M B Shah, N Santosh Hegde
10 March, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 955 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 8th September 1993 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in Income Tax Reference No. 91 of 1988. The Court allowed reference application and answered the following q...
Supreme Court Of India
K.S. Subbiah P-Illai vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R C Lohati, S S M Quadri, S P Bharucha
10 March, 1999·BHARUCHA., J.In these appeals filed by the assessee, which -is a Hindu Undivided Family, we are concerned with the Assessment Years 1959-60 to 1965-66 and 1969-70 and 1970-71. The question that we are required to consider reads thus:"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the re...
Supreme Court Of India
B. Balaiah vs The Superintending Engineer And ...
Judges: S R Babu, S Phukan
10 March, 1999·1. These appeals are directed against an order made by the High Court setting aside a decree which was passed in terms of the Award made by an Arbitrator when the dispute between parties was referred to him. There were as many as 11 claims made by the appellant and they are as follows:DETAILS OF CLA...
Supreme Court Of India
Senapathy Whitely Ltd. vs Karadi Gowda And Anr.
Judges: M Rao, A Misra
10 March, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal preferred by the Management of Senapathy Whitely Ltd. against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Appeal No.3959 of 1997 dated September 29, 1997 confirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 21766...
Supreme Court Of India
Eastern Chemical And Minerals vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R C Lahoti, S P Bharucha, S S M Quadri
09 March, 1999·PETITIONER:EASTERN CHEMICAL AND MINERALS Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/03/1999 BENCH:R.C.Lahoti, S.P.Bharucha, S.S.M.Quadri JUDGMENT:Bharucha. J.Under appeal is the decision of a Division Pench of the High Court at Madras. The Division Bench answered in the negativ...
Supreme Court Of India
Punnu Ram And Ors vs Chiranji Lal Gupta (Dead) By Lrs. ...
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, M B Shah
09 March, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 940 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH, J. In these appeals, only question involved is whether factors laid down in Section 19(4) of the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, l956(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") are to he read as cumulatively or alterna...
Supreme Court Of India
Joseph And Anr. vs Batho Mary And Ors.
Judges: K Thomas, D Mohapatra
09 March, 1999·1. In second appeal a learned Single Judge of the High Court interfered with the concurrent finding on facts and dismissed the suit filed by the appellants as per the impugned judgment. Hence, the appellants preferred this appeal by special leave.2. The factual position is this:A land having an exte...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.