Utkal Commercial Corporation vs Central Coal Fields Ltd
Judges: Mrs Sujata Manohar, R C Lahoti
20 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 166 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The only question which requires to be determined in this appeal is whether the application of the appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act for appointment of an Arbitrator was barred by limitation. A few dates may be ...
Supreme Court Of India
Naresh Pal Singh vs Raj Karan And Anr.
Judges: G Pattanaik, S Quadri
18 January, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order of Allahabad High Court, releasing the accused-Raj Karan on bail. The High Court appears to have accepted the plea of the accused that he was on election duty at the relevant point of time and, accordingly, has released him on bail. No at...
Supreme Court Of India
Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Vaman And Anr.
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
18 January, 1999·ORDER B.N. Kirpal, J.I. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed against the interim order passed by the High Court. The High Court was concerned with a writ petition filed by the respondent in which 'the prayer was that he should be called for an interview for appointment to the post of Executiv...
Supreme Court Of India
Powanammal vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr
Judges: K T Thomas, D P Wadhwa, S S M Quadri
15 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 104 The Judgments of the Court were delivered by QUADRI, J. Leave is granted.The appellant is the mother of the detenue, Smt. Lakshmi, who was detained by order No. B.D.F.G.I.S. No. 38/98 dated 12th April, 1980, passed by the second respondent, under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu...
Supreme Court Of India
A.P. Coop. Central Agricultural ... vs V. Venkateswar Rao And Anr.
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
13 January, 1999·ORDER B.N. Kirpal, J.1. The sole question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether on a correct interpretation of Section 103 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, the appellant-Bank can seize and sell the tractor of the respondents for realisation of the amount of loan paya...
Supreme Court Of India
Sundaram Finance Ltd vs Nepc India Ltd
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, B N Kirpal
13 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 89 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KIRPAL, J. Leave granted.An important question which arises for consideration in these cases is whether under Section 9 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter refer0red to as `the 19% Act') the Court has jurisdic...
Supreme Court Of India
Calcutta Municipal Corporation vs Pawan K. Saraf And Anr
Judges: K T Thomas, D P Wadhwa, S S Mohammed Ouadri
13 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 74 The following Order of the Court was delivered :When we dismissed the Special Leave Petition on 5.11.1998 we also said that reasons of such dismissal will follow. Accordingly we state our reasons hereunder :Special leave petition has been filed by the Calcutta Municipal Corp...
Supreme Court Of India
Paramjit Singh vs State (Nct Of Delhi)
Judges: G Pattanaik, M Shah
13 January, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is being prosecuted for an offence under the provisions of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. He has been lingering in jail since May, 1992. His co-accused Jasbir Singh was released on bail by the learned Designated Judge on 16-8-1992. The a...
Supreme Court Of India
American Remedies Pvt. Ltd. And ... vs Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh And Anr
Judges: Dr A S Cj, M Srinivasan, R P Sethi
12 January, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999(1) SCR 63 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Following its earlier judgment in Writ Petition No. 2425 of 1997, which had been dismissed on 14.2.1997, a Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner herein, through wh...
Supreme Court Of India
S.S.M. Brothers (P) Ltd. And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ...
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde
12 January, 1999·1. These appeals by special leave impugn the correctness of the view taken by a Division Bench of the High Court at Madras in Tax Case No. 146 of 1979 (see [1985] 155 ITR 794) and followed in Tax Case No. 140 of 1980. The questions before the High Court were (page 796) :(1) Whether, on the facts and...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.