Cit, Gujarat Iii vs Cadila Chemicals
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare, N S Hegde
23 February, 1999·1. The questions raised in these three appeals, relating to three different sets of assessment years, are common. They read thus:(1) Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition under Section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of premium paid for the purchase...
Supreme Court Of India
All India Federation Of Central Excise vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: K Venkataswami G B Pattanaik, M Jagannadha Rao
22 February, 1999·PETITIONER:ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/02/1999 BENCH:K. VENKATASWAMI, G.B. PATTANAIK, & M. JAGANNADHA RAO.JUDGMENT:M.JAGANNADHA RAO,J.We have before us writ petition - W.P. 651 of 1997 and certain Interlocutory Applications b...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Swami Sachidanand S.C.S. ...
Judges: Dr A S Cj, M Srinivasan, N Santosh Hegde
22 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 826 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave granted.The Division Bench of the High Court in writ petitions filed in public interest by various persons and Organisations challenging the regulations made by the appellant in the conduct of Amar Nath yatra to the Holy...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs A. Md. Bilal And Co.
Judges: A Anand, M Srinivasan, N S Hegde
22 February, 1999·1. There is a delay of 502 days in filing this appeal. In the application seeking condonation of delay, no explanation, worth the name, let alone a satisfactory or reasonable explanation, has been offered. When faced with this fact situation, the learned Attorney General fairly conceded that the man...
Supreme Court Of India
Subhendu Mishra vs Subrat Kumar Mishra And Anr.
Judges: A Anand, M Srinivasan, N S Hegde
22 February, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. The bail granted to the appellant by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge on 8th August, 1997 was cancelled by the High Court on 28th August, 1997 on a petition filed by the brother of the deceased. The State had, however, not chosen to question the grant of bail in the High Court.3...
Supreme Court Of India
Rabindra Kumar Nayak vs Collector , Mayurbhanj , Orissa & Ors
Judges: K T Thomas, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
19 February, 1999·PETITIONER:RABINDRA KUMAR NAYAK Vs. RESPONDENT:COLLECTOR, MAYURBHANJ, ORISSA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1999 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JUDGMENT:QUADRI.J.Leave is granted.The question that arises in this appeal is whether the appellant was holding ’office of profit’ under the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sreekumar Mukherjee vs Zuinel Abedin & Ors
Judges: K Venkataswami, N Santosh Hegde
19 February, 1999·PETITIONER:SREEKUMAR MUKHERJEE Vs. RESPONDENT:ZUINEL ABEDIN & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1999 BENCH:K.Venkataswami, N.Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:JUDGEMENT Santosh Hegde. J.Leave granted.This appeal arises out of an order dated 2.9.1997 in G.A. No. 2410/1997 in Election Petition No. 7.96 passed by the...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Ranjit Singh
Judges: G B Pattanaik, M B Shah, R C Lahoti
19 February, 1999·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P.Vs. RESPONDENT:RANJIT SINGH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, M.B.Shah, R.C.Lahoti.JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK,J.The respondent was a Stenographer of a learned Judge of Allahabad High Court. He stood the trial for having committed offences under Sections 417, 420, 46...
Supreme Court Of India
M Krishna vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G B Pattanaik, M B Shah
19 February, 1999·PETITIONER:M.KRISHNA Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KARNATAKA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1999 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaik, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK. J.Leave granted.The appellant is a Class-I officer of Karnataka Administrative Service. On 24.8.1989 a report was drawn up against him under Section 13(1)(e) read w...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhruv K. Jaiswal vs State Of Bihar
Judges: K Thomas, M Shah
19 February, 1999·1. The petitioner is involved in a murder case and was taken into custody on 21-2-1988. According to the learned Counsel the petitioner continues to be in custody even though the Investigating Agency has laid the final report. The impugned order has been passed on a bail application filed by the pet...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.