Kammari Brahmiah And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of ...
Judges: G B Pattanaik, M B Shah
03 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 361 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH, J. Short question in this appeal is whether some accused could be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 325 read with 149, when all of them were charged for an offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. The appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Khilari vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: G Nanavati, M S Hegde
03 February, 1999·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. The conviction is based upon the extra judicial confession made before P.W. 5 - Ram Krishan. The trial court and the High Court have believed the said extra-judicial confession as nothing could be...
Supreme Court Of India
Karnataka Lokopayogi Ilaka Tantrika,Sahayak Noukarara Sangha vs The State Of Karnataka & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, R C Lahoti
03 February, 1999·PETITIONER:KARNATAKA LOKOPAYOGI ILAKA TANTRIKA,SAHAYAK NOUKARARA SANGHA Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1999 BENCH:Sujata V. Manohar, R.C.Lahoti JUDGMENT:Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.This is an appeal from a judgment and order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribun...
Supreme Court Of India
V S Palanichamy Chettiar Firm vs C Alagappan & Another
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, D P Wadhwa
03 February, 1999·PETITIONER:V.S. PALANICHAMY CHETTIAR FIRM Vs. RESPONDENT:C. ALAGAPPAN & ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1999 BENCH:S.Saghir Ahmad, D.P.Wadhwa JUDGMENT:D.P. WADHWA, J.Leave granted.These are judgment- debtors two appeals against common judgment dated December 24, 1997 of the Madras High Court, pass...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri K.S. Villasa vs M/S. Ladies Corner And Anr.
Judges: G Nanavati, N S Hegde
03 February, 1999·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellant has been convicted under the Contempt of Courts Act and directed to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/. Aggrieved by his conviction and the order of payment of fine, the appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Act.2. The charges framed against the appellant wer...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Tamil Nadu vs Mahalakshmi Textile Mills Ltd
Judges: M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
03 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 371 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The short facts leading to this appeal are as follows : The respon-dent- assessee was assessed to sales tax by the Assessment Officer. After some time, he invoked the suo motu powers of the Deputy Commissioner under Section 32...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Associated Fibre And Rubber ...
Judges: M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
03 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 375 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The respondent-assessee is a private limited company. The original assessment for the years 1972-73 was made on 28.2.1973 determining the loss as Rs. 78,823. A sum of Rs. 78,500 claimed as interest paid by the assessee on amou...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Corporation Bank Ltd.
Judges: M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
03 February, 1999·1. The assesses, a banking company, had the assessment for the year ending on December 31, 1968, completed on October 4,1969. Subsequently, however, the assessment was reopened under Section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to bring to tax a sum of Rs. 54,485 in respect of interest suspense accou...
Supreme Court Of India
Commnr Hindu Religious and ... vs Smt. P.S. Sethurathinam
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, M B Shah
02 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 332 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. The Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, exercising powers under Section 45(3) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 of 1959...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Kumari Tanuja
Judges: S P Bharucha, N Santosh Hegde
02 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 315 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. SANTOSH HEGDE, J. The respondent in C.A. No. 2308/89 filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay, being W.P. No. 1317/88. In the said writ petition, the respondent herein challenged the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committe...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.