Shri R.V. Lyngdoh vs State (Delhi) Spl. Establishment
Judges: G T Nanavati, N Santosh Hegde
04 February, 1999·NANAVATI.J This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Gauhati in Criminal Appear No. 32 of 1982. The High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 409 IPC and Section 5(2) read with Section 5 (1) (C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd
Judges: M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
04 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 400 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The respondent-assessee is a private limited company. In the proceedings for assessment of tax for the year ending 30.6.1964 relevant to the Assessment year 1965-66, the assessee transferred a sum of Rs. 3,45,000 out of the su...
Supreme Court Of India
Miss Sophy Kelly And Anr. vs Chandrakant Ganpat And Ors.
Judges: G Nanavati, N S Hegde
04 February, 1999·ORDER G.T. Nanavati, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act as she has been found guilty of having committed Civil contempt. She has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- and also to undergo detention in a civil prison for 15 days.2. As it ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Tarajan Tea Co. (P) Ltd
Judges: M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
04 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 396 The following Order the Court was delivered :The three questions referred to the High Court for answer in this matter are as follows :"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal having held that there was no case for re-opening the assessment...
Supreme Court Of India
Baldev Singh Dhingra And Others vs Madan Lal Gupta And Others
Judges: S B Majmudar, R P Sethi
04 February, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (1) SCR 377 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.B. MAJMUDAR, J This appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') has brought in challenge the order passed by the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India in a transferred ca...
Supreme Court Of India
Thiru Sudali @ Madasamy vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: G Nanavati, N S Hegde
04 February, 1999·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellant was tried along with Pandey @ Ram Krishnan for committing murder of Kittu @ Muthu Krishnan in Sessions Case No. 95/76. The court of Sessions, Madurai, acquitted both the accused. On appeal by the State, the High Court convicted both of them for the offence punishab...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramchandra Ohdar vs The State Of Bihar
Judges: G Nanavati, N S Hegde
04 February, 1999·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He was tried along with two others for commission of that offence. The Trial Court convicted all the three persons but the High Court acquitted the other ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs D. Shankaraiah And Ors.
Judges: M Srinivasan, U Banerjee
04 February, 1999·1. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in C. R. No. 4 of 1979, in which the High Court relied upon an earlier judgment of its own in C. R. No. 11 of 1981, dated April 13, 1983 (see [1985] 154 1TR 893), and answered the reference in the affirmative in favo...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Tamil Nadu vs Senthil Kumar and Anr
Judges: G Pattanaik, S S Quadri
03 February, 1999·ORDER Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. The State of Tamil Nadu is in appeal by special leave from the order of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated 29.1.98 in N.C.P. No. 768/97 quashing the order of detention and setting the detenu at liberty.3. The facts giving rise to this appeal may ...
Supreme Court Of India
Karnataka Lokopayogi Ilaka ... vs The State Of Karnataka and Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, R C Lahoti
03 February, 1999·Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.This is an appeal from a judgment and order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dated 4.9.1992 in various applications including Application No.16 of 1990. By the said judgment and order the Tribunal dismissed the application of the appellant and upheld the legality of...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.