State Of Punjab vs Vilasrao D. Deshmukh
Judges: R C Lahoti, S Ragendra Babu
03 December, 1999·R.C. LAHOTI,J This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter RPA, for short) preferred by a candidate successful at the election but against whom an election petition filed by a candidate who had lost at the election has been allowed by the High Court...
Supreme Court Of India
Udai Kant Jha vs U.O.I.
Judges: K Thomas, M Shah
03 December, 1999·1. Leave granted.2. We are told that appellant in this case has already undergone imprisonment for nearly five months. The offence is under Section 135 for the Customs Act on the allegation that he was found in possession of 48 wrist watches costing about Rs. 22,000/-. Incident happened on 1st Janua...
Supreme Court Of India
C. K. Raveendkan vs State Of Kerala
Judges: G B Pattanaik, Mb Shah
02 December, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(5) SCR 140 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATTANAIK, J. Appellant Raveendran along with two other accused persons stood charged under Sections 302 and 20! IPC. The learned Sessions Judge convicted Raveendran under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and accused Gopalan under Sect...
Supreme Court Of India
N.T.C. (Ida Pattern) Employees ... vs Union Of India And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, U Banerjee
02 December, 1999·ORDER S.L.P. (C) No. 16732 of 1997 and I.A. Nos. 1 to 9 in S.L.P. (C) No. 16732 of 19971. We heard learned counsel for the parties. In our view till these matters are finally decided interest of justice requires that the officers/employees of N.T.C. and its subsidiaries whose cases have been cleared...
Supreme Court Of India
New India Assurance Compafiy vs Shri Satpal Singh And Ors
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
02 December, 1999·PETITIONER:NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPAFIY Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI SATPAL SINGH AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/12/1999 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.Leave granted.A 10 year old girl met with her death in a truck accident. Her name was Dupinder Kaur. The accident occurred while she was tr...
Supreme Court Of India
Aehok Kumar vs State Of Haryana
Judges: G T Nanavati, S N Phukan
02 December, 1999·PETITIONER:AEHOK KUMAR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF HARYANA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/12/1999 BENCH:G.T.Nanavati, S.N.Phukan JUDGMENT:Nanavati The appellant has been convicted under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 as, on 24.9.1995. he was found in possession of charas ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gajra Bevel Gears vs Collector Of Customs
Judges: S Bharucha, R Lahoti, N S Hedge
02 December, 1999·1. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and we do not find any reason to interfere. Learned Counsel for the appellant relied upon the judgment of a learned single judge of the High Court at Calcutta in Debabrata Ghosh v. Assistant Collector of Customs . That was a case in which the auctio...
Supreme Court Of India
Vinod Bhanti vs State Of Bihar And Ors.
Judges: S Kurdukar, S R Babu, D Mohapatra
02 December, 1999·ORDER S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. This civil appeal is directed against the judgment dated May 1, 1996 rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Patna in Letters Patent Appeal No. 776 of 1995 affirming the judgment of the learned single Judge.2. The relevant facts for the disposal of this appeal m...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Customs vs East African Traders
Judges: S Bharucha, R Lahoti, N S Hegde
02 December, 1999·1. The learned Attorney General, appearing for the appellant, has restricted his argument to the observations of the Tribunal in the order under appeal relating to the piercing of the veil of the respondent company to determine whether or not the buyer and the seller were related persons, this being...
Supreme Court Of India
Geetha vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G T Nanavati, S N Phukan
02 December, 1999·NANAVATI. J The appellant and her husband were tried for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 392 and 201 I.P.C. In the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bangalore City in Sessions Case No. 175 of 1990. The allegation against the appellant was that on 30.10.1989 between 4.30 and 7.30 p.m...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.