M/S Mohan Meakin Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise , Kochi
Judges: S P Bharucha, R C Lahoti
14 December, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S. MOHAN MEAKIN LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOCHI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/12/1999 BENCH:S.P.Bharucha, R.C.Lahoti JUDGMENT:SANTOSH HEGDE, J.The appellant in these appeals manufactures beer in its Solan and Ghaziabad Breweries for which it uses Lupofresh aromati...
Supreme Court Of India
B K-Narayana Pillai vs Pararneswaran Pillai & Anr
Judges: S P Kurdukar, R P Sethi
13 December, 1999·PETITIONER:B.K-NARAYANA PILLAI Vs. RESPONDENT:PARARNESWARAN PILLAI & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/12/1999 BENCH:S.P.Kurdukar, R.P.Sethi JUDGMENT:Leave granted. Heard-.. . The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit against’ the appellant-defendant praymg. for the grant of mandatory and prohibitory injuncti...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs Arun Kumar Agarwal And Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, S Rajendra Babu
13 December, 1999·JUDGMENT WITH C.A. No. 7232/99 (@ SLP (C) No. 6016/98), C. A. No. 7233/99 (@ SLP (C) No. 6012/98) and SLP (C) No. 12834/98.1999 Supp(5) SCR 278 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. Leave granted in SLR (C) Nos. 5883/98, 6016/98 and No. 6012/98.Writ petition was filed in the H...
Supreme Court Of India
B.K.N.Pillai vs P. Pillai And Anr
Judges: S P Kurdukar, R P Sethi
13 December, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(5) SCR 271 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SETHI, J. Leave granted. Heard.The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit against the appellant-defendant praying for the grant of mandatory and prohibitory injunction seeking eviction allegedly on the ground of his being a licensee...
Supreme Court Of India
Securities and Exchange Board Of ... vs Bombay Stock Exchange Brokers ...
Judges: B Kirpal, A Misra
10 December, 1999·1. Keeping in view the fact that similar petitions are pending all over the country we direct that Civil Writ No. 126 of 1993 in the matter of BSE Brokers Forum and Ors. v. SEBI and Ors. and other connected pending matters of the Bombay High Court be transferred to this Court. Hearing of other petit...
Supreme Court Of India
K. Kuttan Pillai vs S. Vijayankutty Nair And Ors.
Judges: M Rao, R Sethi
10 December, 1999·ORDER M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Special leave granted.2. This is an appeal filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kerala rendered on 1.4.1998 in Second Appeal No. 313 of 1990.3. The suit was filed by the respondents for a declaration of easementary right of prescri...
Supreme Court Of India
Raees Ahmad vs State Of U.P. And Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, Syed Shah Quadri
10 December, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(5) SCR 226 The following Order of the Court was delivered : Leave granted.At the relevant time the Nagar Panchayat, Jalalabad (the municipality) consisted of 21 members, thus: one President and fifteen elected, two ex- officio and three nominated members. A no-confidence motion wa...
Supreme Court Of India
K.G. Derasari And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
10 December, 1999·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Tribunal was justified in an application for contempt by issuing direction which tantamounts to the review of its earlier decision?3. The dispute relates to the principles to be...
Supreme Court Of India
Auto Engineering Works vs Bansal Trading Company And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, S R Babu, N S Hegde
10 December, 1999·ORDER S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties on I.A. Nos.1 and 2. Delay in filing the application (I.A.No.2) to bring on record the legal representatives of the sole proprietor of the petitioner firm is condoned. Learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection to the legal...
Supreme Court Of India
Gurmail Singh vs Principal, Govt. College Of ...
Judges: S Majmudar, V Khare
10 December, 1999·ORDER S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted.2. By consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this appeal was heard finally.3. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties we find that the Labour Court having held in case of the appellant whose services were terminated on 30.9.1981, that Section 25F of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.