Abdul Kuddus Mondal And Others vs State Of Assam And Another
Judges: R C Lahoti, N Santosh Hegde
23 August, 1999·PETITIONER:ABDUL KUDDUS MONDAL AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/08/1999 BENCH:R.C.Lahoti, N. Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:The application, for bringing on record legal representatives of petitioner NO.2, is allowed. Legal representatives are brought on record...
Supreme Court Of India
Resham Singh vs Raghbir Singh & Anr
Judges: S N Phukan, V N Khare
23 August, 1999·PETITIONER:RESHAM SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:RAGHBIR SINGH & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/08/1999 BENCH:S.N.Phukan, V.N.Khare, JUDGMENT:PHUKAN,J This is an appeal against the judgment and order passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Revision No. 2006 of 1983. By the...
Supreme Court Of India
R Gandhi vs U O I & Anr
Judges: K Venkataswami, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
23 August, 1999·PETITIONER:R.GANDHI Vs. RESPONDENT:U.O.I. & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/08/1999 BENCH:K.Venkataswami, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JUDGMENT:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.Leave is granted. This appeal, an off-shoot of the judgment of this Court in Common Cause vs. Union of India [1987 (1) SCC 142], arises...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Neycer India Ltd.
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
23 August, 1999·1. Appeals are admitted.2. The only question involved is with regard to the valuation of the flushing cistern. The cistern, according to the appellant, would include the fittings such as handle assembly, ball valve assembly, over flow assembly, syphon assembly, outlet flange assembly and flush pipe ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Territory Chandigarh and Anr vs Ram Chander and Sons and Ors
Judges: R P Sethi, S Saghir Ahmad
22 August, 1999·SETHI, J.L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T..J Delay condoned in SLP(C)..../99 (CC 902/99).Leave granted. Sector 17 is a commercial centre in Chandigarh, the city beautiful of India which is also the capital of Punjab and Haryana, the two most prosperous States of the country....
Supreme Court Of India
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ... vs Gokulprasad Maniklal Agarwal and ...
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
20 August, 1999·1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The respondent-Gokulprasad Maniklal Agarwal was working as an Assistant Administrative Officer with the Appellant insurance company. He challenged initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him by the appellant by filing Writ Petition No. 2128/84 in the High...
Supreme Court Of India
Dharmarathmakara R .A. Ramaswamy ... vs The Educational Appellate ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, A P Misra
20 August, 1999·Misra, J.This appeal is directed against revisional order passed by the High Court of Karnataka on 25th September, 1989 confirming the order dated 13th February, 1980, passed by the Educational Appellate Tribunal under Section 8 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Contr...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. vs Tuljaram Balaji And Anr.
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
20 August, 1999·JUDGMENT G.T. Nanavati, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The facts of this case are similar to the facts of Civil Appeal No. 6066 of 1995 (State of Maharashtra v. Digambar . In that case this Court has held that the High Court was not right in entertaining the petition under Article 226 of th...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. vs Mahesh Chandra Pandey And Ors.
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
20 August, 1999·JUDGMENT G.T. Nanavati, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The trial Court has rightly held that no clear evidence was led by the prosecution to prove the demand of dowry. Only two witnesses were examined by the prosecution on this point and their evidence was found to be vague. The original in...
Supreme Court Of India
Ador Samia Private Limited vs Peekay Holding Limited And Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, D P Mohapatra
20 August, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp. (1) SCR 658 The following Order of the Court was delivered :This Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of Constitution of India is moved by the petitioner challenging an order of the learned Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay in Arbitration Petition No. 288 of 1998 move...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.