The Industrial Credit and ... vs Karnataka Ball Bearings ...
Judges: Umesh C Banerjee, G B Pattanaik
31 August, 1999·BANERJEE, J.Leave granted.Authority of Receivers to effect sale of immovable properties prior to the passing of the decree is the focal point for consideration in this appeal, by the grant of special leave being directed against the Bench decision of the Bombay High Court. The Bench in deciding the ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. and Anr. vs Ram Kishore and Anr.
Judges: G Nanavati, S Phukan
31 August, 1999·JUDGMENT S.N. Phukan, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. Two appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.05.97 of the High Court of Allahabad in Writ Petition (C) No. 7150/93 as also against the order dated 27.02.98 in review petition in CMA No. 81970/97. The High Court upheld...
Supreme Court Of India
Maharashtra Girni Kamgar Union vs S. Bhattacharji And Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Srinivasan, U C Banerjee
31 August, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(2) SCR 89 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.B. MAJMUDAR, J. This appeal, on certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Bombay, brings in challenge the decision rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court in Appeal no. 685 of 1984 decided on 18th July, 1986...
Supreme Court Of India
The Industrial Credit & Investment Corporation Of India Ltd vs Karnataka Ball Bearings Corpn Ltd & Ors
Judges: Umesh C Banerjee, G B Pattanaik
31 August, 1999·PETITIONER:THE INDUSTRIAL CREDIT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD Vs. RESPONDENT:KARNATAKA BALL BEARINGS CORPN.LTD. & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/08/1999 BENCH:Umesh C. Banerjee, G.B.Pattanaik JUDGMENT:BANERJEE, J.Leave granted.Authority of Receivers to effect sale of immovable properties prior...
Supreme Court Of India
T Sivasubramaniam & Ors vs Kasinath Pujari & Ors
Judges: V N Khare, S N Phukan
31 August, 1999·PETITIONER:T. SIVASUBRAMANIAM & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:KASINATH PUJARI & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/08/1999 BENCH:V.N.Khare, S.N.Phukan JUDGMENT:V.N. KHARE, J.:The appellants herein are the landlords (hereinafter referred to as the landlord). The landlord filed a petition before the Rent Controller ...
Supreme Court Of India
T K Latika vs Seth Karsandas Jamnadas
Judges: A P Misra, K T Thomas
31 August, 1999·PETITIONER:T.K. LATIKA Vs. RESPONDENT:SETH KARSANDAS JAMNADAS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/08/1999 BENCH:A.P.Misra, K.T.Thomas JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.A landlord approached the Rent Control court prematurely and lost the cause not only regarding the timing of her approach to the court but on merits as well...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P & Anr vs Ram Krishna & Anr
Judges: G T Nanavati S N Phukan
30 August, 1999·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:RAM KRISHNA & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/08/1999 BENCH:G.T.Nanavati S.N. Phukan JUDGMENT:PHUKAN,J.Delay condoned. Leave granted. Two appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.05.97of the High Court of Allahabad in Writ Petition ( c )...
Supreme Court Of India
Shiv Kumar vs Hukam Chand And Anr
Judges: S P Kurdukar, K T Thomas, N Santosh Hegde
30 August, 1999·PETITIONER:SHIV KUMAR Vs. RESPONDENT:HUKAM CHAND AND ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/08/1999 BENCH:S.P.Kurdukar, K.T.Thomas, N.Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:THOMAS,J It is as well for the protection of accused persons in sessions trials (in India) that provision is made to have the case against him prosecuted o...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs Ram Samujh And Anr
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
30 August, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(2) SCR 76 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH, J. Leave granted.As respondent No. 1 has not engaged any counsel, the Registry was directed to appoint an advocate as amicus curiae. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Only question involved in this appeal ...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Aruna Straw Boards (P) Ltd
Judges: K Venkataswami, M Jagannadha Rao
27 August, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 Supp(1) SCR 529 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. VENKATASWAMI, J. This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against an order dated 19.4.88 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as `the Tribunal').The question that a...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.