S.M. Bawankar vs The Chief Officer, Municipal ...
Judges: S Ahmed, R Sethi
29 April, 1999·ORDER Sethi, J.1. The appellant claims to have been appointed as Head Mistress on the basis of her seniority in the high schools on 25.9.1990. Respondent No. 4 is stated to have been appointed as Assistant Head Master on 5.10.1990. The President of the respondent-municipal council issued the orders ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs Magma Leasing Limited
Judges: K T Thoms, M B Shah
29 April, 1999·PETITIONER:NEPC MICON LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:MAGMA LEASING LIMITED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/1999 BENCH:K.T.Thoms, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT:Shah, J.Leave granted.NEPC Micon Limited, Appellant No. 1 and its directors approached the High Court for quashing the proceedings in Case No. C-494 of 199...
Supreme Court Of India
Handloom House Ernakulam vs Regional Director , Esi
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K T Thomas
29 April, 1999·PETITIONER:HANDLOOM HOUSE ERNAKULAM Vs. RESPONDENT:REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/1999 BENCH:S.Saghir Ahmad, K.T.Thomas JUDGMENT:THOMAS,J.Leave granted.Handloom House is a Co-operative Society engaged in manufacturing and selling handloom fabrics. It disburses to its employees, bes...
Supreme Court Of India
Arumugham (Dead) By Lrs. And Ors vs Sundarambal And Anr
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, N Santosh Hegde
29 April, 1999·JUDGMENT 1999 (2) SCR 950 The following Judgment of the Court was delivered : Special leave granted.This is an appeal filed by the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff against the judgment of the High Court of Madras in Second Appeal No. 1946 of 1983 dated 30th September, 1997. By the sai...
Supreme Court Of India
Sakhi Mandalani vs State Of Bihar And Ors.
Judges: S Ahmed, S R Babu
29 April, 1999·ORDER S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant, who was the sister-in-law of the deceased Manju Mandalani, was convicted under Sections 304B/34, 498-A I.P.C. and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. She was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 3...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India and Ors. vs Harish Chandra Goswami
Judges: G Pattanaik, M Srinivasan, N S Hegde
28 April, 1999·1. The respondent herein was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1963 and in the due course, was promoted on selection basis as Lieutenant Colonel and worked as Cloned till 7th October, 1989. He was a Commanding Officer in 316 Station Workshop (Maintenance) from 18th December, 1982 to 23rd February, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ahamed Mohaideen Zabbar vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati M Srinivasan, N Santosh Hegde
28 April, 1999·PETITIONER:AHAMED MOHAIDEEN ZABBAR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/1999 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, M SRINIVASAN, & N. SANTOSH HEGDE.JUDGMENT: NANAVATI, J.This petition is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of detention passed by t...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Vvs Sugars vs Govt Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors
Judges: S R Babu, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, S P Bharucha, B N Kirpal
28 April, 1999·PETITIONER:M/S. VVS SUGARS Vs. RESPONDENT:GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/1999 BENCH:S.R.Babu,Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri,S.P.Bharucha, B.N.Kirpal JUDGMENT:BHARUCHA, J. :We are concerned with the interpretation of Section 21 of the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Sup...
Supreme Court Of India
Dattatraya Laxman Kamble vs Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkunde & Anr
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K T Thomas
28 April, 1999·PETITIONER:DATTATRAYA LAXMAN KAMBLE Vs. RESPONDENT:ABDUL RASUL MOULALI KOTKUNDE & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/04/1999 BENCH:S.Saghir Ahmad, K.T.Thomas JUDGMENT:THOMAS,J.Leave granted.This litigation, even by now a quarter of a century old, shows fortune fluctuations as between a landlord and his ten...
Supreme Court Of India
V.V.S.Sugars vs Govt.Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, B N Kirpal, S Rajendra Babu, S S M Quadri, M B Shah
28 April, 1999·JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY:S.P. BHARUCHA, J.BHARUCHA, J. :We are concerned with the interpretation of Section 21 of the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961, as amended by Act 25 of 1976. Principally, the provisions to be dealt with are sub-sections 3D, 4 and 5 of Sectio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.