The Tax Recovery Officer Ii, ... vs Gangadhar Vishwanath Ranade ...
Judges: S V Manohar, G Pattanaik
10 September, 1998·ORDER Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment and order of 15th of December, 1982 of the Bombay High Court reported in [(1989) 117 ITR at page 176]. Under the impugned judgment the High Court has set aside the attachment levied under Rule 11 of the Second Schedule to the Inc...
Supreme Court Of India
Abbai Maligai Partnership Firm ... vs K. Santhakumaran And Ors
Judges: Dr A S Anand, V, N Khare, D P Wadhwa
09 September, 1998·JUDGMENT 1998 Supp. (1) SCR 535 The following Order of the Court was delivered ;These appeals are directed against the order made by High Court of Madras dated 7,4.1994 in Review C.M.P. Nos. 44 and 45 of 1994 in Civil Revision Petition Nos. 4974 and 4975 of 1983, The Rent Controller ordered eviction...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S S Ahmad, S R Babu
09 September, 1998·1. This appeal is directed against an order made by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, on an application filed before it, questioning the correctness of an order made by the respondent, compulsorily retiring the appellant from service, with effect from May 29, 1995, on ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rani Laxmibai Kshetriya , & Gramin Bank Chairman vs Chand Behari Kapoor & Ors & Kantya Naowani & Ors
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik
09 September, 1998·PETITIONER:RANI LAXMIBAI KSHETRIYA ,& GRAMIN BANK CHAIRMAN.Vs. RESPONDENT:CHAND BEHARI KAPOOR & ORS. & KANTYA NAOWANI & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR & G.B. PATTANAIK JUDGMENT:PATTANAlK, J.The judgment and order dated 22nd December, 1992 of the Division Bench of Allahab...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamnabai Ramchandra Vadekar vs Modern Auto and Machinery Agency
Judges: A Anand, V Khare
08 September, 1998·1. The appellants are the landlords of commercial premises being Room No. 9, 1st Floor, Vadekar Mansion, Lamington Road, Bombay. The respondents are the tenants of the said premises, being the heirs of the original tenant. On 18-5-1982 a notice was issued by the landlord demanding the arrears of ren...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Council Of Legal Aid and ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, V Khare
08 September, 1998·1. The issue involved in this special leave petition is of great public importance. It concerns medical check-up and treatment of the visually-handicapped. There is no gain saying that health is an important facet of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and it i...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Punjab and Ors vs Bakshish Singh
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, S Rajendra Babu
08 September, 1998·J U D G M E N T S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J.The respondent who was a police constable in Punjab was dismissed from service on 1.6.1998 after a regular departmental enquiry on the charge of unauthorised absence from duty. This order was challenged by the respondent in a suit filed in the trial court on 16.7.1...
Supreme Court Of India
Harkant Hiralal Vohra (Dead) By ... vs Union Of India and Anr
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
08 September, 1998·JUDGMENT K. VENKATASWAMI, J.-----------------The legal representatives of the deceased appellant are prosecuting this appeal. In this judgment, wherever the word 'appellant' is used, it will mean the deceased appellant.The appellant was aggrieved by the Order dated 1.3.82 which denied the benefit of...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. vs Raghunath Balmiki And Ors.
Judges: K Venkataswami, A Misra
08 September, 1998·1. Civil Appeal No. 1249/93 was filed by the Bharat Coking Coal Limited (for short "BCCL") against an Award dated 20.7.92 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, Dhanbad, in Reference Case No. 48/91. That appeal was dismissed by this Court on 18.7.96. Thereafter, the BCCL have f...
Supreme Court Of India
T.B. Suryawanshi vs Govt. Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, G Pattanaik
08 September, 1998·1. Delay of 345 days in filing the review petition is not satisfactorily explained. The petition, therefore, deserves to be dismissed on this ground alone. However, as the review petition is moved by the petitioner-in-person we have considered the review petition on merits also.2. The order sought t...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.