Muthaiah Sekhar vs Nesamony Tpt Corporation Ltd & Anr
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra Act Headnote
01 September, 1998·PETITIONER:MUTHAIAH SEKHAR Vs. RESPONDENT:NESAMONY TPT. CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/09/1998 BENCH:K. VENKATASWAMI, A.P. MISRA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:[WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13385 OF 1996] J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami, J.Civil Appeal No. 13391/86:Aggrieved by the dismissal of his ...
Supreme Court Of India
Samee Khan vs Bindu Khan
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K T Thomas Act Headnote
01 September, 1998·PETITIONER:SAMEE KHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:BINDU KHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/09/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Two neighbours are engaged in a long drawn fight in civil court on a small issue. The fight started at the lowest level (Munsiff’s Court) and they have no...
Supreme Court Of India
M S Bindra vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K T Thomas Act Headnote
01 September, 1998·PETITIONER:M.S. BINDRA Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/09/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS,J.J U D G M E N T Appellant had a steep rise in the hierarchy of Indian Revenue Service and was held in great esteem by his superiors until the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Samir Chanda vs Managing Director, Assam State ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
01 September, 1998·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami, J.In spite of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal has been serve, the Respondent has not entered appearance to contest this appeal.The facts, as found by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kamrup, Guwahati, are given below.The appellant was a passenger in a bus...
Supreme Court Of India
G.L. Gupta, Advocate vs R.K. Sharma And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal
01 September, 1998·1. The petitioner Shri G.L. Gupta, Advocate is the President of District Bar Association, Ratlam. He has filed this petition alleging that Shri Suresh Chandra Kelwa, a practising advocate at Ratlam was hand-cuffed on 11-9-1995 and produced before the Railway Magistrate, Ratlam on 12-9-1995 after bei...
Supreme Court Of India
U.P.State Road Transport Corpn vs Regopma; Transport Authority And ...
Judges: A S Anand, B N Kirpal
01 September, 1998·ORDER C.A.No.4637 of 1998 ( @ SLP(C) No. 13937/92) Levea granted.The short question requiring our consideration is : whether the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter the 'Corporation') is required to renew the permits obtained by it to ply its vehicles on a notified route during the su...
Supreme Court Of India
Aggarwal Brothers vs State Of Haryana And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
01 September, 1998·1. These appeals by special leave impugn the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby writ petitions filed by the appellants, and others, were dismissed.2. The assessee (appellants) hire shuttering to builders and contractors who use it in the course of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sheel Chand vs Prakash Chand
Judges: A S Anand, B N Kirpal
01 September, 1998·O R D E R This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court dated 13th September, 1996. Appellant is the tenant. Respondent is the landlord. The premises had been let out by the predecessor-in-interest of the present respondent-landlord in 1968. The suit for eviction wa...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Sales Tax Madhya ... vs Ganesh Trading Co.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
01 September, 1998·1. Delay condoned.Leave granted.The question which the High Court was required to consider reads thus:Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board of Revenue was justified in holding that soyabean is covered under the terms and is included in entry No. 1 of Part V of Schedule II...
Supreme Court Of India
Commr. Of Sales Tax, M.P. vs General Foods Pvt. Ltd., Indore
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
01 September, 1998·1. The question that the High Court of Madhya Pradesh was required to consider in these appeals reads thus :Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the Board of Revenue was justified in holding that the husk of soyabean was liable to be taxed as the same was not covered by Notif...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.