Chandraprakash Madhavrao Dadwa and ... vs Union Of India and Others
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
25 September, 1998·ORDER M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This review application has been filed by the petitioners in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16646 of 1995 to review the order dated 1.9.1995 dismissing the said SLP at the stage of admission. The basis for the said review petition is as follows, Under the impugned o...
Supreme Court Of India
Minerals And Metals Trading Corporation Of India Ltd vs Sales Tax Officer & Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, V N Khare Act Headnote
25 September, 1998·PETITIONER:MINERALS AND METALS TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:SALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/09/1998 BENCH:S.P.BHARUCHA. & V.N.KHARE.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT The following Judgment of the Court was delivered:The appeal impugns the correctness of a judgment of a...
Supreme Court Of India
Pritpal Singhal vs State Of Delhi
Judges: G Pattanaik, A Misra
25 September, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr. R.K. Jain appearing for the appellant and Mr. N.N. Goswami and Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi appearing for the respondent.3. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302/34, I.P.C. and has been sentenced for life. He is more than 70 years' old and he is...
Supreme Court Of India
In Re: Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate vs Unknown
Judges: A Anand, M Mukherjee
25 September, 1998·JUDGMENT A.S. Anand, J.1. The alleged contender-Ajay Kumar Pandey, a practising advocate, filed a criminal complaint against an Advocate Mr. Mahesh Giri and an Additional District Judge, Ms. Saroj Bala, then posted as VII Additional District Judge, Lucknow, Under Sections 499 and 500 IPC, after firs...
Supreme Court Of India
In Re vs Ajay Kumar Pandey
Judges: A S Anand, M K Mukherjee
25 September, 1998·JUDGMENT DR. A.S.ANAND.J.The alleged contemner-Ajay Kumar Pandey, a practising advocate, filed a criminal complaint against an Advocate Mr. Mahesh Gir and an Additional District Judge, Ms. Saroj Bala, then posted as VII Additional District Judge, Lucknow, under Sections 499 and 500 IPC, after first ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate vs Unknown
Judges: A Anand, M Mukherjee
25 September, 1998·ORDER Dr. A.S. Anand, J.1. The alleged condemner-Ajay Kumar Pandey, a practising advocate, filed a criminal complaint against an Advocate Mr. Mahesh Giri and an Additional District Judge, Ms. Saroj Bala, then posted as VII Additional District Judge, Lucknow, under Sections 499 and 500 IPC, after fir...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Orissa And Ors. vs Jagannath Industries And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
24 September, 1998·ORDER We have heard learned counsel. We are of the view that no interference in the facts and circumstances of the case is required. The question of law is left open for decision in an appropriate case. The appeals arc dismissed, with no order as to costs....
Supreme Court Of India
Jaspal Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
24 September, 1998·J U D G M E N T Nanavati, J.The Appellant has been convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 5 of the TADA Act as he was found in possession of one DBBL gun .12 bore and five live cartridges on 17/18.3.1992. The trail court relying upon the evidence of ASI Balbir Singh and P.W. 4 - Man ...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Kumar vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
24 September, 1998·JUDGEMENT NANAVATI. J.The appellant was tried with 7 other accused for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, erozepur, in Sessions Case No. 7/86.In order to prove its case, the prosecution had examined P.W. 4 Shugan Lal...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaspal Sing vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
24 September, 1998·Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.T.Nanavati Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P.Kurdukar Ujjagar Singh, Sr.Adv., G.C.Sharma, Ms.Naresh Bakshi, Advs, with him for the appellant R.S.Sodhi, Kuldip Singh and Rupesh Kumar, Advs. for the Respondent The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: Nanavati. J.The appellant has...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.