H.P. Housing Board vs Sharda Devi And Ors.
Judges: K Venkataswami, D Wadhwa
30 October, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. We do not think that any case is made out for interference with the judgment under appeals. However, we consider it necessary that the word "court" occurring in the following sentence in para 9 of the judgment of this Court in Ram Piari v....
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat K. Gupta vs Arun Kumar And Anr.
Judges: M Mukharji, S S Quadri
30 October, 1998·1. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The proceeding arising out of a complaint filed by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ("the Act" for short) against Respondent 1 has been quashed by the High Court solely on the ground that in his order dat...
Supreme Court Of India
Kanwar Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Union Of India
Judges: Dr A S Anand, Cj, V N Khare
30 October, 1998·JUDGMENT 1998 Supp (2) SCC 505 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.N. KHARE, J. Leave granted.This group of Civil Appeals is directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Delhi High Court and the questions involved therein relate to the quantum of compensation with regard to acquisit...
Supreme Court Of India
The Daily Partap vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , Punjab , Haryana , Himachal Pradesh And Union Tereit Ory , Chandigarh
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
29 October, 1998·PETITIONER:THE DAILY PARTAP Vs. RESPONDENT:THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, HARYANA, Himachal Pradesh and Union Tereit ory, Chandigarh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/10/1998 BENCH:S.B.Majmudar, M.Jagannadha Rao JUDGMENT:S.B.Majmudar, J.Both these appeals for special leave to appeal under Ar...
Supreme Court Of India
Karnataka Pawn Brokers Assn & Ors Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Ors Etc
Judges: S P Bharucha, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
29 October, 1998·PETITIONER:KARNATAKA PAWN BROKERS ASSN. & ORS. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/10/1998 BENCH:S.P.BHARUCHA, K.VENKATASWAMI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT K.Vankataswami, J.The common question that arises for consideration in all these appeals is whether a Pawn...
Supreme Court Of India
The Daily Partap vs The Regional Provident Fund ...
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
29 October, 1998·S.B.Majmudar, J.Both these appeals for special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India have brought in challenge two orders of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing two Letters Patent Appeals arising out of the decision of the learne...
Supreme Court Of India
The Daily Partap vs The Regional Provident Fund ...
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
29 October, 1998·JUDGMENT S.B.Majmudar, J.Both these appeals for special leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India have brought in challenge two orders of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing two Letters Patent Appeals arising out of the decision of t...
Supreme Court Of India
The Director Of School Education ... vs A.N. Kandaswamy And Anr.
Judges: G Nanavati, S R Babu
29 October, 1998·ORDER Nanavati, J.1. The appellants have challenged in this appeal the decision of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 2010 of 1992.2. Both the respondents were initially appointed as teachers in Panchayat Union Primary School. In the year 1985, they were serving as teachers in the Mi...
Supreme Court Of India
Secretary, Devasthan Management ... vs Bhimanna Mallappa Mali and Ors.
Judges: S Kurdukar, M J Rao
28 October, 1998·ORDER S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The lands bearing Survey Nos. 200/2 admeasuring 3 acres 2 gunthas and 201/2 admeasuring 12 acres 8 gunthas situate at village Madgyal admittedly belonged to Maruti Deo, a deity, through V.M. Kulkarni. It is also not disputed that the said Deosthan is managed by a Managing C...
Supreme Court Of India
In Re: Under Article 143(1) Of The ... vs Unknown
Judges: S Bharucha, M Mukherjee, S Majmudar, S V Manohar, G Nanavati, S S Ahmad, K Venkataswami, B Kirpal, G Pattanaik
28 October, 1998·JUDGMENT S.P. Bharucha, J.1. Article 143 of the Constitution of India confers upon the President of India the power to refer to this Court for its opinion questions of law or fact which have arisen or are likely to arise and which are of such a nature and of such public importance that is expedient ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.