Harbans Lal vs State Of Haryana And Anr
Judges: G T Nanavati, S Rajendra Babu
11 November, 1998·J U D G M E N T Nanavati, J.A Criminal proceeding has been initiated against the appellant pursuant to the complaint filed by the Deputy Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Chandigarh. The appellant approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court for getting the same quashed. As his contention tha...
Supreme Court Of India
Ruchi Fabrics Ltd. vs State Of M.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
11 November, 1998·JUDGMENT S.P. Bharucha, J.1. This appeal by special leave impugns the correctness of a judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Ruchi Fabrics Ltd. v. State of M.P., [1997] 106 STC 300.2. The Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act contains Schedule I. By reason of Sect...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Kerala And Ors vs M/S Travancore Chemicals & Marufacturing Co And Aru
Judges: S P Bharucha, G T Nanavati, B N Kirpal
11 November, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S TRAVANCORE CHEMICALS & MARUFACTURING CO.AND ARU. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/11/1998 BENCH:S.P.Bharucha, G.T.Nanavati, B.N.kirpal JUDGMENT:Kirpal.J.Leave granted. Delay condoned.In these appeals the appellants are aggrieved by the common judgment of t...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Harish Chandra & Co
Judges: S B Majmudar, S Saghir Ahmad, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
11 November, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P.Vs. RESPONDENT:HARISH CHANDRA & CO.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/11/1998 BENCH:S.B. MAJMUDAR, S. SAGHIR AHMAD, K. VENKATASWAMI.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T MAJMUDAR, J.Leave granted in S.L.P.(C) No. 6307 of 1995.We have heard learned senior counsel for the parties in these ...
Supreme Court Of India
Virendra Kashinath Ravant And Another vs Vinayak N Joshi And Others
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, K T Thomas
11 November, 1998·PETITIONER:VIRENDRA KASHINATH RAVANT AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:VINAYAK N.JOSHI AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/11/1998 BENCH:S.Saghir Ahmad, K.T.Thomas JUDGMENT:Thomas J.Loavo grantod.Appellants are landlords of one Ms. Shanta Sabnis. A building situate at Benham Hall Lane, Grigaum, Mumbai is own...
Supreme Court Of India
Rasik Auto Stores and Ors vs Navin V Hantodkar and Anr
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
10 November, 1998·O R D E R We have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners. His only contention was that in the light of Clause 13(3)(vi) of the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949, because the landlord is having other premises of his own in the adjoining part of the very suit premises, the suit for posse...
Supreme Court Of India
Rasik Auto Stores and Ors vs Navin V Hantodkar and Anr
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
10 November, 1998·D E R We have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners. His only contention was that in the light of Clause 13(3)(vi) of the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949, because the landlord is having other premises of his own in the adjoining part of the very suit premises, the suit for possessio...
Supreme Court Of India
Rangnath Vishnu Mulluck and Anr vs Vithoba Rama Rahane and Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati, S Rajendra Babu
10 November, 1998·J U D G M E N T NANAVATI, J.The appellants who were the purchasers from the landlord have filed this appeal against the judgment of the High Court in write petition No. 799 of 1982. The respondent-Vithoba was the tenant of nine pieces of lands. In respect of five lands, proceedings were initiated un...
Supreme Court Of India
The Appropnate Authority And Another vs Smt Sudha Patit And Another
Judges: Sujata V, G B Pattanaik
10 November, 1998·PETITIONER:THE APPROPNATE AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:SMT SUDHA PATIT AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/11/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V., G.B. PATTANAIK.JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK, J.This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 6th March, 1907, passed by the Division Bench of Karnataka High...
Supreme Court Of India
Rallis India Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: S P Bharucha, V N Khare
10 November, 1998·JUDGMENT V.N.KHARE.J.These civil appeals are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Madras passed in Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 871-872 of 1983 dated 28.7.1992 and Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.1100-1101 of 1992 dated 21.9.1992 wherein the High Court has held that the goods in question...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.