Income-Tax Officer And Anr. vs K.L. Srihari And Ors.
Judges: S Agrawal, S Ahmed, M Srinivasan
25 March, 1998·1. By order dated November 19, 1996, these special leave petitions have been directed to be placed before the three-judge Bench because it was felt that dissonant views have been expressed by different Benches of this court on the scope and effect of reopening of an assessment under Section 147 of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab Urban Planning and Dev. ... vs M/S Shiv Saraswati Iron and Steel ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
24 March, 1998·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami, J.Special leave granted.Heard counsel on both sides.The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of the contract in question by returning (delivery) the goods weighing 124.255 Metric Tonnes rail/blooms or in the alternative to direct the defendant to pay a sum...
Supreme Court Of India
Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage ... vs Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
24 March, 1998·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami, J.The common question of law that arises for consideration in all these appeals filed against a common judgment of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal Nos. 1205 to 1210 of 1984 and 250 of 1985, is whether the Tamil Nadu Water Supply & Drainage Board is an institutio...
Supreme Court Of India
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Agrawal, S Ahmed, M Srinivasan
24 March, 1998·ORDER IA No. 381. We have perused the report of the Committee constituted to monitor directions given by this Court in the matter of environmental impact on Taj Mahal due to the "Concert Yanni". The said report of the Committee contains the following conclusions and recommendations:"1. The Taj Mahal...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tamil ... vs S. Balasubramanian
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D P Wadhwa
24 March, 1998·J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.The following question was referred to the High court of Madras under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of Section 15595) of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramesh Chander vs Imtiaz Khan And Anr.
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
24 March, 1998·ORDER Contempt Petition No. 524 of 19971. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as she has already filed another contempt petition this petition does not survive. Hence, it is disposed of with no orders.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. According to the learned counsel for 2...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Inter State Transport Agency vs Bibi Habiba Khatoon (Dead) By L. Rs
Judges: A S Anand, S P Bharucha
24 March, 1998·O R D E R The respondent instituted Title Suit No.6 of 1974 for eviction of the appellant on ground of default in payment of rent. That suit was dismissed on 31.1.1978. The first appeal preferred by the respondent before the District Judge succeeded vide judgment and order dated 31.3.1979. The appel...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Orissa vs Ravi Talkies
Judges: S Agrawal, S S Ahmad
24 March, 1998·1. These appeals by special leave raise a common question regarding the validity of the Orissa Entertainment Tax Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The question is whether in the absence of a machinery regarding assessment being provided either in the Act or in the Orissa Entertainmen...
Supreme Court Of India
Punjab Urban Planning & Dev Authority vs M/S Shiv Saraswati Iron & Steel Re-Rolling Mills
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra Act Headnote
24 March, 1998·PETITIONER:PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV. AUTHORITY Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S SHIV SARASWATI IRON & STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/03/1998 BENCH:K. VENKATASWAMI, A.P. MISRA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:K. Venkataswami, J.J U D G M E N T Special leave granted.Heard counsel on both sides.The appellant ...
Supreme Court Of India
A G Varadarajulu & Anr vs The State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors
Judges: K Venkataswami, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
23 March, 1998·PETITIONER:A.G. VARADARAJULU & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/03/1998 BENCH:K. VENKATASWAMI, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1998 Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Venkataswami Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jagannadha Rao S. Sivasubraman...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.