East India Commercial Co Pvt Ltd , Smt D P Mantosh vs Corporation Of Calcutta
Judges: A S Anand, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
30 March, 1998·PETITIONER:EAST INDIA COMMERCIAL CO. PVT.LTD., SMT. D.P. MANTOSH Vs. RESPONDENT:CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/03/1998 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, B.N. KIRPAL ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:KIRPAL, J.WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1826/1998 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. @ NO. 7343/82) J U D G M E N T Leave granted in ...
Supreme Court Of India
East India Commercial Co. ... vs Corporation Of Calcutta
Judges: A S Anand, B N Kirpal
30 March, 1998·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1826/1998 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. @ NO. 7343/82) J U D G M E N T KIRPAL, J.Leave granted in SLP(C) No. 7343 of 1982.The only question which arises in these appeals relates to the determination of annual value under Section 168 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 in respect of bu...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Autar Singh vs State Public Service Tribunal And ...
Judges: S Majmudar, A Misra
30 March, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. Respondent 1 is a pro forma respondent. With the consent of learned counsel for both the sides, the appeal was heard finally.3. The short question is whether the punishment of dismissal from service inflicted on the appellant -- a police constable, on the ground that he had remai...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Kailash
Judges: G Nanavati, S Quadri
30 March, 1998·1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the point raised in this appeal is clearly covered by the decision of this Court in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, and the Tribunal was wrong in taking a contrary view relying upon the decis...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Udai Narain
Judges: A Anand, S R Babu
30 March, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. The respondent was serving as an Additional Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow, when he came to be arrested on 8-11-1993 on the allegation that he had demanded and accepted a bribe of rupees 2 lakhs. He was released on bail on 23-11-1993. While he was in custody, he was plac...
Supreme Court Of India
Er. K.K. Jerath vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ors
Judges: K T Thomas, S Rajendra Babu
27 March, 1998·J U D G M E N T S. Rajendra, Babu. J.The petitioner filed a petition under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail apprehending his arrest. The High Court which had granted an interim relief earlier on the said petition, dismissed the same subsequently. Hence this petition chall...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of India vs D. Hanumantha Rao And Anr.
Judges: S Agrawal, S Ahmed, M Srinivasan
27 March, 1998·1. Special leave granted.2. The only question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether Respondent 1, D. Hanumantha Rao (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent"), is entitled for extension of service after his attaining the age of 58 years under Rule 19(1) of the State Bank of India...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay vs Bombay Tyres International Ltd & Ors
Judges: K T Thomas S Rajendra Babu Act Headnote
27 March, 1998·PETITIONER:MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY Vs. RESPONDENT:BOMBAY TYRES INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/03/1998 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS S. RAJENDRA BABU ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S. RAJENDRA BABU. J.J U D G M E N T C.A. 1179/94 & SLPS (C) Nos. 15507/87. 853/88 and 14587/87.In SLPs leav...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd Rafi vs State Of U P
Judges: G T Nanavati, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri Act Headnote
27 March, 1998·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:MOHD. RAFI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/03/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:NANAVATI, J.Leave granted.J U D G M E N T The appellant was convicted under Se...
Supreme Court Of India
Sunil K. Sinha vs State Of Bihar Through S.P. Cbi
Judges: M Punchhi, K Venkataswami, B Kirpal
27 March, 1998·1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel.2. In view of the long incarceration of the appellant since 25-5-1996 and the trial likely to consume some time, we think that a case for grant of bail has been made out in favour of the appellant. Accordingly, we allow this appeal, set aside the impugned orde...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.