Vajrala Paripurnachary vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Cji, K T Thomas Act Headnote
28 July, 1998·PETITIONER:VAJRALA PARIPURNACHARY Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/07/1998 BENCH:CJI, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.A young lady aged about 25, Kadari Lingamma, was burnt to death. The crime has been attributed to her paramour Vajrala Paripurnachary (appell...
Supreme Court Of India
The Commissioner, Corporation Of ... vs K.N. Vasudeva Murthy (Dead) ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, A P Misra
28 July, 1998·O R D E R Special leave granted.These two appeals are filed against the two orders of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 23.8.95 in W.A. No.2825/95 and dated 10.11.95 in I.A. VI for recalling the order dated 23.8.95.We do not consider it necessary to give full facts of the case rel...
Supreme Court Of India
Gurnam Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
28 July, 1998·With Crl. Appeal No. 420/98 and Death Ref. No. 2/98 J U D G M E N T NANAVATI, J.Criminal Appeal No. 381/98 is filed by Gurnam Singh, who h as been convicted under Sections 364 and 302 IPC for kidnapping Inder Singh, Puran Singh and Baldev Singh and then committing their murder. He has also been conv...
Supreme Court Of India
Valvue Armaturen V.U. Beratung ... vs National Fertilizer Ltd. and Ors
Judges: A S Anand, D P Wadhwa
27 July, 1998·(with Appln (s). for exemption from filing c/c of the imnpugned Judgment) Date: 27/07/98 This Petition was called on for hearing today.SORAM:Hon'ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa For Petitioner (s) Mr. Arun Jaitely, Sr. adv., Mr. Gpal Jain Adv., Mr.R.N. Karanjawala, adv., Ms...
Supreme Court Of India
National Textiles Corporation ( South Maharashtra ) Limited vs Tamil Nadu Co-Operative , Marketing Federation Ltd & Anr
Judges: S C Agarwal, S P Bharucha Act Headnote
27 July, 1998·PETITIONER:NATIONAL TEXTILES CORPORATION (SOUTH MAHARASHTRA) LIMITED Vs. RESPONDENT:TAMIL NADU CO-OPERATIVE, MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/07/1998 BENCH:S.C. AGARWAL, S.P. BHARUCHA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:BHARUCHA, J.J U D G M E N T The judgment and order of a Division Bench ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka & Ors vs Kempaiah
Judges: M K Mukherjee, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri Act Headnote
27 July, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:KEMPAIAH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/07/1998 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:QUADRI,J.Leave is granted.J U D G M E N T In these appeal, filed by the State of Karnataka against the common judgment of the Division Benc...
Supreme Court Of India
National Textiles Corporation ... vs Tamil Nadu Co-Operative, ...
Judges: S C Agarwal, S P Bharucha
27 July, 1998·J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA, J.The judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court at Bombay is the subject matter of this appeal.The appeal arises in the following circumstances, shortly put. On 4th February, 1991, the appellant entered into an agreement with the first respondent. Thereunder ...
Supreme Court Of India
Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs Narender And Ors.
Judges: M Mukharji, S Quadri
24 July, 1998·ORDER M.K. Mukherjee, J.1. Leave granted in all the petitions.2. In view of the express provision of Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a presumption must be drawn that the holder of the cheque received the cheque, of the nature referred to in Section 138, for the discharge of any ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rakesh Ranjan Gupta vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: M Punchhi, K Thomas, S R Babu
24 July, 1998·1. Leave granted. Heard both sides.2. The appellant in this case is a medical practitioner. He stands charge-sheeted for offence under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of a complaint made by the second respondent. At the FIR stage the appellant moved the High Court for quashing the...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Bhogawati S.S.K. Ltd.
Judges: B Kirpal, M Srinivasan
24 July, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. After going through the records, in our opinion, the High Court should have directed the Tribunal to state the case, because a question of law did arise in the present case. We accordingly allow this appeal and direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following questio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.