State Of W.B. And Ors. vs Texmaco Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, K Venkataswami
30 July, 1998·1. The respondent-Company has a scheme whereunder it pays to its employees what is called an "incentive bonus". The appellants took the stand that the incentive bonus fell within the definition of "salary" or "wage" contained in Section 2(j) of the West Bengal State Tax on Professions, Trades, Calli...
Supreme Court Of India
In Re: Bhavani River - Sakthi ... vs Unknown
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal, V Khare
30 July, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition No. 17333 of 1995 dated 17-7-1997.3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and examining the record, we are satisfied that the matter befo...
Supreme Court Of India
Sabia Khan And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal, V Khare
30 July, 1998·1. Refusal to grant a new licence for saw mill by Regional Director, Social Forestry, Forest Range, Rampur, to the petitioners vide communication dated January 18, 1998, based on the injunction issued by this Court on 12-12-1996 and 4-3-1997 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995 has been put in i...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Ors vs Dinanath Shataram Karekar & Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
30 July, 1998·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA & ORS..Vs. RESPONDENT:DINANATH SHATARAM KAREKAR & ORS.. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/07/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G E M E N T The original respondent, Dinanath Shantaram Karekar, who died during the pendency of the proceedings before t...
Supreme Court Of India
Chandrabhagabai and Ors vs Ramakrishna and Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jjagannadha Rao
29 July, 1998·J U D G M E N T S.B. Majmudar, J In this Appeal by way of special leave, the heirs of original Plaintiff No. 1 and the remaining Plaintiff Nos.2 to 8, have brought in challenge the judgment and order rendered by the High Court of Bombay dismissing their Second Appeal and confirming the decree of is ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nihal Singh vs K.K.Gamkhar (Dead) Through Union ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, M Srinivasan
29 July, 1998·J U D G E M E N T SRINIVASAN, J.The appellant was working as L.D.C and officiating U.D.C. in Land & Development office, Delhi Administration. He was placed under suspension w.e.f 2.3.1959 because disciplinary enquiry was contemplated. The Land & Development office was transferred to the Central Gove...
Supreme Court Of India
Venugopal vs State Karnataka
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
29 July, 1998·J U D G M E N T NANAVATI J This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal appeal No.85/91.The High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 498-A IPC, set aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted him under Secti...
Supreme Court Of India
Adya Singh vs State Of Bihar
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
29 July, 1998·J U D G M E N T The appellant is challenging in this appeal his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act recorded by Sessions Court, Patna in Sessions Case No.86 of 1976 and confirmed by the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.57 of 1976.Learned counsel for t...
Supreme Court Of India
Jai Pal & Anr , Jai Sham vs State Of U T Chandigarh & Ors
Judges: M K Mukherjee, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
29 July, 1998·PETITIONER:JAI PAL & ANR., JAI SHAM Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/07/1998 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.K. Mukherjee, J J U D G E M E N T These three appeals, which have been heard together, stem from an F.I.R lodged by Riaz Masih (...
Supreme Court Of India
Sreerama Murthy vs State Of A P
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
29 July, 1998·PETITIONER:SREERAMA MURTHY Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF A. P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/07/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T These appeals are filed against the common judgement and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh Crl. A. No. 69/96 and Crl. A. No. 483/96....
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.