Re ; Chandigarh News Line (Indian ... vs Re ; Chandigarh News Line (Indian ...
Judges: Dr A S Anand, D P, Wadhwa
31 July, 1998·JUDGMENT WITH Suo-Motu Contempt Petition No. 286 of 1998 1998 (3) SCR 944 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Taking note a news item reading "SC orders removal of homoeo council chief, in the Chandigarh Newsline published by the Indian Express Group, Chandigarh on 30.4.1998, this Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Bhadra Sahakari Sakkare Karkhana ...
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
31 July, 1998·1. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner is right when he contends relying upon a Constitution Bench decision of this Court in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v Union of India, that as per Rule 330(b) the payment of duty under protest can be said to have taken place only when a letter of pr...
Supreme Court Of India
In Re: Chandigarh Newsline ... vs Unknown
Judges: A Anand, D Wadhwa
31 July, 1998·1. Taking note a news item reading "SC orders removal of homoeo council chief, in the Chandigarh Newsline published by the Indian Express Group, Chandigarh on 30.4.1998, this Court on May 1, 1998, being of the view that not only the heading of the news item was absolutely incorrect and misleading bu...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagdish Prasad And Ors. vs Sukh Ram
Judges: S Agrawal, B Kirpal
31 July, 1998·1. An application has been filed for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased-Gulabi Devi, petitioner No. 2. The said application shows that Gulabi Devi died on February 7, 1997 when the matter was pending in the High Court. Since Gulabi Devi died when the matter was pending before t...
Supreme Court Of India
Employees State Insurance Corporation vs S K Aggarwal And Ors
Judges: M M Punchhi, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
31 July, 1998·PETITIONER:EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Vs. RESPONDENT:S.K. AGGARWAL AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/07/1998 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.The respondents were, at the material time, directors of a company M/s. Indo Japa...
Supreme Court Of India
O.N.G.C. Ltd. vs G.S. Chugani And Anr.
Judges: S V Manohar, G Pattanaik
31 July, 1998·1. Special leave granted.2. The respondent was a legal adviser with the appellant-Corporation. He retired from service on 30-6-1991. While the respondent was in service a draft superannuate benefit scheme for the employees of the appellants was approved by the Executive Committee with some modificat...
Supreme Court Of India
Jai Prakash And Ors vs State Of Haryana
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
30 July, 1998·PETITIONER:JAI PRAKASH AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF HARYANA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/07/1998 BENCH:G.T NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Nanavati. J.J U D G E M E N T The four appellant are challenging in this appeal the judgement and order passed by the High court of Punjab and Haryana...
Supreme Court Of India
Maulana Md. Kamaluddin And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, Cji, K Thomas, S S Quadri
30 July, 1998·1. Proceedings for contempt would remain suspended uptil 10th August 1998 on which the matter is coming up for hearing....
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Sunder Yadav And Ors. vs State Of Bihar
Judges: M Mukharji, D Wadhwa
30 July, 1998·1. One of the questions which requires our answer in these appeals is whether the prosecution is obliged to explain the injuries sustained by the accused in the same occurrence and whether failure of the prosecution to so explain would mean that the prosecution has suppressed the truth and also the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhavani River vs Sakthi Sugars Ltd
Judges: A S Anand, B N Kirpal, V N Khare
30 July, 1998·O R D E R Leave granted.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Wrist Petition No. 17333 of 1995 dated 17th July, 1997.After hearing learned counsel for the parties and examining the record we are satisfied that the matt...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.