Shri Nain Singh Bhakuni and Ors vs Union Of India and Anr
Judges: S B Majmudar, S Saghir Ahmad, M Jagannadha Rao
08 January, 1998·J U D G M E N T S.B. Majmudar. J.This appeal by grant of special leave under Article 136 of the constitution of India has brought in challenge the judgment and order rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal. Principal Bench at New Delhi in O.A. No. 1 of 1989. filed by the 429 original applica...
Supreme Court Of India
Kasturi and Sons vs Collector Of Customs, Madras
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
08 January, 1998·1. The only question involved relates to the classification of the rubber blankets imported by the appellant. According to the department they were assessable under Entry 40.16 whereas the appellant claimed that they fell under Entry 40.08. The Tribunal, following its earlier decision, has come to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Sans Pal Singh vs State Of Delhi
Judges: M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
08 January, 1998·1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of the Additional Judge, Designated Court, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 47 of 1997, whereby the accused-appellant Sans Pal Singh stands convicted for offences under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 read with...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India & Another vs V M Salgaoncar And Bros ( P ) Ltd Etc
Judges: B N Kirpal, V N Khare Act Headnote
08 January, 1998·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:V.M. SALGAONCAR AND BROS. (P) LTD. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/01/1998 BENCH:B.N. KIRPAL, V.N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.(With C.A. No. 3409 of 1987) J U D G M E N T Whether vessels which are used as transhippers can also be treated as "...
Supreme Court Of India
Babu Ram vs State ( Delhi Administration ) And Others
Judges: G T Nanavati, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
08 January, 1998·PETITIONER: BABU RAM Vs.RESPONDENT:STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/01/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:NANAVATI,J.J U D G M E N T These two appeals arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal Nos. 116/84 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Directorate Of Enforcement Shri ... vs Ashok Kumar Jain Directorate Of ...
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S P Kurdukar, K T Thomas
08 January, 1998·WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 23 OF 1998 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3563 of 1997] J U D G M E N T Thomas, J.Special leave granted.These two appeals are directed against an order passed by the Delhi High Court which interfered with the order passed by a Sessions Judge dismissing a petition filed by one...
Supreme Court Of India
Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise, Pune
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
08 January, 1998·1. The question involved in this appeal is as to under what entry does the product, sold under the brand name of "Surje" which is a dietary supplement of superior proteins, fall. According to the appellant, this product would come under Heading 04.04, whereas according to the Department, it will fal...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of H.P. And Anr. vs Kedar Nath Sood And Anr.
Judges: K Venkataswami, A Misra
08 January, 1998·ORDER CA No. 14081 of 19961. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 1888 of 1995 dated 8-12-1995.2. By the judgment under appeal, the High Court had directed the appellants to grant family pension to the first respondent h...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Explosives Ltd. And Anr. vs Kanpur Nagar Mahapalika And Ors.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal, V Khare
08 January, 1998·1. The subject-matter of controversy in the present case is the demand of octroi for the period 1969 to 1983 by the respondent-Kanpur Nagar Mahapalika from the appellant amounting to approximately Rs six crores. In all a sum of Rs 1,50,17,892 has been paid by the appellant to the Kanpur Nagar Mahapa...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahipal (A) Mahaveer Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan
Judges: G T Nanavati, S S M Quardri
08 January, 1998·J U D G M E N T NANAVATI, J.This appeal is directed against the judgement and order passed by the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.Crl. Appeal No. 27/29. The High Court reversed the order of acquittal and convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.Guru Nam Singh (P.W.17), Je...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.