Sumedico Corporation And Anr. vs Regional Provident Fund Commr.
Judges: S Majmudar, V Khare
19 February, 1998·1. These two appeals are moved by a common appellant that has felt aggrieved by order dated 8-12-1982 under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 passed by the authorities functioning under the Act against the present appellant. Civil Appeal No. 5540 of...
Supreme Court Of India
High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan vs Ramesh Chand Paliwal & Anr
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
19 February, 1998·PETITIONER:HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:RAMESH CHAND PALIWAL & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/02/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.SAGHIR AHMAD. J.J U D G M E N T The Authority which has been dispensing justice to others, is, today before us seek...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Veddula Veera Reddy & Ors
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S P Kurdukar, K T Thomas Act Headnote
19 February, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT:VEDDULA VEERA REDDY & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1998 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, S.P. KURDUKAR, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.P. KURDUKAR. J.J U D G M E N T Cherukuri Sambaiah was an affluent person having lands and house at village Pedda Makkana...
Supreme Court Of India
Manoranjan Singh vs State Of Delhi
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
19 February, 1998·PETITIONER:MANORANJAN SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF DELHI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Nanavati, J.J U D G M E N T This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Additional judge, Designated Court, Delhi, in Sessions ca...
Supreme Court Of India
Mariyappa & Others vs State Of Karnataka & Others
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
19 February, 1998·PETITIONER:MARIYAPPA & OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1998 BENCH:S.B. MAJMUDAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.JAGANNADHA RAO.J.Leave granted.J U D G M E N T The appellants have filed this appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Karnat...
Supreme Court Of India
Chhidda Singh vs Dv Director Of Consolidation And Ors
Judges: A S Anand, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
19 February, 1998·PETITIONER:CHHIDDA SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:DV. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/02/1998 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, K. VENKATASWAMI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Delay Condoned.O R D E R Application for personal hearing is rejected.We have perused the review petition and the connected record. Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M/S Bedi and Company Private Limited
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, Syed Shah Quadri
18 February, 1998·J U D G M E N T QUADRI, J.The Revenue is in appeal, by special leave, against the order of the karnataka High Court dated August 4, 1980, in I.T.R.C. No. 180 of 1975, answering the following question referred to it under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act. 1961, in the negative, that is, in favour...
Supreme Court Of India
V Uthirapathi vs Ashrab Ali & Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
18 February, 1998·PETITIONER: V.UTHIRAPATHI Vs. RESPONDENT:ASHRAB ALI & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/02/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, M. JAGANNADHA RAO.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.J U D G M E N T We are disposing of this SLP by a reasoned order at the stage of admission, after condoning the delay. The SLP ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Uttar Pradesh vs Nahar Singh ( Dead ) & Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati, Syed Shah Mohammed Qardri Act Headnote
18 February, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE UTTAR PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT:NAHAR SINGH (DEAD) & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/02/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QARDRI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:QUADRI, J.J U D G M E N T These four appeals arise from the common judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dat...
Supreme Court Of India
Girijanandan Singh Parashram ... vs New Cotton Ginning And Pressing ...
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal, S R Babu
18 February, 1998·1. This is a tenant's appeal. The predecessor-in-interest of the appellant was inducted as a tenant of the demised premises in 1948 at a monthly rent of Rs. 25. On 11-12-1974, the respondent-landlord filed an application before the Rent Controller, Akot seeking permission to terminate the tenancy of...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.