K. Lakshmanan and Co. And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: B Kirpal, S Kurdukar
04 February, 1998·ORDER CAs Nos. 5086-97 of 19841. The short question which arises for consideration in this batch of appeals is whether or not the income derived from business of rearing silkworms is "agricultural income" as defined under Section 2(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act").2. The appellan...
Supreme Court Of India
Sodan Singh vs N.D.M.C. and Others
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
04 February, 1998·J U D G M E N T M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.I. 83/1995: (Bishwanath Roy) Clemant has been found eligible but only for business in `tea'. The applicant's place of garment business war not accepted. According to him he cannot, due to illness, carry on tea business.The Committee found in its order dated 12.12...
Supreme Court Of India
Sheikh Abdul Hamid And Another vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:SHEIKH ABDUL HAMID AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, V.N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:V. N. KHARE, J J U D G E M E N T This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.497 of the Madhya Pradesh high Court i...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P & Ors vs Ashok Kumar Saxena And Another Etc
Judges: K T Thomas, M Srinivasan Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P. & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:ASHOK KUMAR SAXENA AND ANOTHER ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS, M. SRINIVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:SRINIVASAN. J.J U D G M E N T This is a case of gross abuse of power by the High Court in its exercise of contempt jurisdiction. The...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs Shri Rati Pal Saroj & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI RATI PAL SAROJ & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.The respondent Rati Pal Saroj was, at the material time, Under Secretary, Union Public Service Commis...
Supreme Court Of India
R Rudraiah & Anr vs State Of Karnataka & Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:R. RUDRAIAH & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:S.B. MAJMUDAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M. JAGANNADHA RAO. J.J U D G M E N T Leave granted in both SLPs.In each of these appeals, the appellants are Sri B. Rudraiah and his son Sr...
Supreme Court Of India
K K Modi vs K N Modi & Ors
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:K.K. MODI Vs. RESPONDENT:K.N. MODI & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:[WITH C.A.No. 614 Of 1998 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18711 of 1997} and T.C.{C} No. 13.97] J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V.Manohar. J.Leave granted in Speci...
Supreme Court Of India
Vimal Kumari vs The State Of Haryana & Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
04 February, 1998·PETITIONER:VIMAL KUMARI Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1998 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.SAGHIR AHMAD, J.J U D G M E N T This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.4.1994 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana ...
Supreme Court Of India
S.Rm.M.Ct.M. Tiruppani Trust vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D P Wadhwa
04 February, 1998·THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998 Present:Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V. Manohar Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.P.Wadhwa Aman Hingorani, Adv. for Hingorani & Associates, Advs. for the Respondent Harish Chandra, C.V.S. Rao, Advs. for B.K. Prasad, Adv. for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Kanhu vs Pushpawati And Anr.
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
04 February, 1998·1. The appellant before us has felt aggrieved by the decision rendered by the High Court of Bombay dismissing his writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. That writ petition was directed against the order of the learned Single Member of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal exercisin...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.