Mewa Singh & Ors vs Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, D P Wadhwa
10 December, 1998·PETITIONER:MEWA SINGH & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:SHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDHAK COMMITTEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/12/1998 BENCH:S. Saghir Ahmad, D.P. Wadhwa.JUDGMENT:D.P.Wadhwa. J.Leave granted.There are 4 appellants. All are employees of the respondent Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC), a body...
Supreme Court Of India
Income-Tax Officer And Anr. vs S. Radha Krishnan And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, D Mohapatra
10 December, 1998·1. The respondent has been served but does not appear. The respondent objected to the inclusion of a sum of Rs. 34,375 representing the gross dividend from a company called BMS Private Limited for the assessment year 1972-73. The assessee's case was that, by virtue of Section 104 of the Income-tax A...
Supreme Court Of India
Hardev Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G T Nanavati, M Srinvasan Act Headnote
10 December, 1998·PETITIONER:HARDEV SINGH & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/12/1998 BENCH:G.T.NANAVATI, M.SRINVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT Nanavati.J.The appellants and four others were accused or having committed murder of Nachattar Singh in pursuance of their conspiracy. Out of six...
Supreme Court Of India
Ganesh Natorao Raut Dudhagaonkar vs Rajani Shankarrao Satav and Ors
Judges: M Srivivasan, M B Shah
09 December, 1998·This appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 calls in question the judgment and order made by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dated 12th March, 1996. Since, the controversy in this reads thus:"Whether the petitioner proves that the Returning...
Supreme Court Of India
Ganesh Natorao Raut Dudhagaonkar vs Rajani Shankarrao Satav and Ors
Judges: M Srivivasan, M B Shah
09 December, 1998·JUDGMENT This appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 calls in question the judgment and order made by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dated 12th March, 1996. Since, the controversy in this reads thus:"Whether the petitioner proves that the ...
Supreme Court Of India
The Deputy Commissioner, Andaman ... vs Consumer Co-Operative Stores ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik
09 December, 1998·J U D G M E N T PATTANAIK. J.The these appeals the Judgment of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court 31st of January, 1994 is under challenge and the question for consideration is whether in view of Andaman & Nicobar Islands (Amendment) Regulation, 1984 the respondents are entitled to claim refu...
Supreme Court Of India
The Deputy Commissioner, Andaman ... vs Consumer Co-Operative Stores ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik
09 December, 1998·PATTANAIK. J.The these appeals the Judgment of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court 31st of January, 1994 is under challenge and the question for consideration is whether in view of Andaman & Nicobar Islands (Amendment) Regulation, 1984 the respondents are entitled to claim refund of the excise...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Cheema Goods Transport ... vs Marudamalai Sri Murugan Textiles ...
Judges: K Venkataswami, A Misra
09 December, 1998·ORDER K. Venkataswami, J.1. The second defendant in O.S. No. 561 of 1978 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Coimbatore, is the appellant in the above appeal. The suit was filed by the first respondent herein for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,37,328/- with interest against the appellant and r...
Supreme Court Of India
Raunaq International Ltd vs I.V R. Construction Ltd. And Ors
Judges: Mrs Sujata Manohar, B N Kirpal
09 December, 1998·JUDGMENT 1998 Supp(3) SCR 421 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J. The Maharashtra State Electricity Board, the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 4893 of 1998 floated a tender dated 20.12.1997 for design, engineering, manufacture, supply, erection and commissioning of la...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of West Bengal vs Monotosh Roy And Anr
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, M Srinivasan
09 December, 1998·JUDGMENT 1998 Supp(3) SCR 435 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SRINIVASAN, J. The first respondent in this appeal was a member of the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service and retired as Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta in February, 1981. At that time, he was drawing pay in the super ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.