Secretary, Devasthan Management ... vs Bhimanna Mallappa Mali and Ors
Judges: S P Kurdukar, M Jagannadha Rao
28 December, 1998·--------S.P. KURDUKAR, J.----------------The lands bearing Survey Nos. 200/2 admeasuring 3 acres 2 gunthas and 201/2 admeasuring 12 acres 8 qunthas situate at village Madgyal admittedly belonged to Maruti Deo, a deity, through V.M.Kulkarni. It is also not disputed that the said Deosthan is managed b...
Supreme Court Of India
Secretary, Devasthan Management ... vs V.Bhimanna Mallappa Mali and Ors
Judges: S P Kurdukar, M Jagannadha Rao
28 December, 1998·--------S.P. KURDUKAR, J.----------------The lands bearing Survey Nos. 200/2 admeasuring 3 acres 2 gunthas and 201/2 admeasuring 12 acres 8 qunthas situate at village Madgyal admittedly belonged to Maruti Deo, a deity, through V.M.Kulkarni. It is also not disputed that the said Deosthan is managed b...
Supreme Court Of India
U.P. State Co-Operative Land ... vs Chandra Bhan Dubey And Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, D P Wadhwa
18 December, 1998·J U D G M E N T D.P.Wadhwa, J.The three appeals are directed against the common judgment dated February 24, 1984 of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) holding that the appellant is an "authority" and an instrumentality of the State and as such amenable to the writ jurisdi...
Supreme Court Of India
Supreme Court Of Employees ... vs Union Of India And Anr.
Judges: S Majmudar, S S Ahmad, K Venkataswami
18 December, 1998·1. we have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Attorney General for the respondent-authorities. In our view as the Rules framed by the Chief Justice of India in exercise of his powers under Article 146(2) of the Constitution of India styled as the Supreme Court Officers and Serv...
Supreme Court Of India
Kapil Mohan vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, D P Mohapatra
18 December, 1998·J U D G M E N T Bharucha, J.The following question, referred to the High Court of Delhi under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue :"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding th...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bihar-Ii , Patna vs Bokaro Steel Limited , Bokaro
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
18 December, 1998·PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BIHAR-II, PATNA Vs. RESPONDENT:BOKARO STEEL LIMITED, BOKARO DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/12/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, & G.B.PATTANAIK., ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 2544-45 of 1988 pertain to assessment year 1972-73 w...
Supreme Court Of India
General Manager , Western Railway & Ors vs Y P Sharma & Ors
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik, Act Headnote
18 December, 1998·PETITIONER:GENERAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:Y.P.SHARMA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/12/1998 BENCH:SUJATA V.MANOHAR, G.B.PATTANAIK, ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar. J.The respondents are Ex-servicemen who were re-employed by the Western Railways some ti...
Supreme Court Of India
Jagannath Mishra vs State Of Bihar
Judges: G Nanavati, S Kurdukar, K Thomas
18 December, 1998·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. In our opinion, the appellant has made out a case for releasing him on bail. We, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the impugned order passed by the High Court so far as the appellant is concerned and order that he be released...
Supreme Court Of India
Kapil Mohan vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, D P Mohapatra
18 December, 1998·Bharucha, J.The following question, referred to the High Court of Delhi under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue :"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the refund of...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab vs Dr. R.N. Bhatnagar And Anr
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
18 December, 1998·JUDGMENT 1998 Supp(3) SCR 693 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.B. MAJMUDAR, J. Leave granted.By consent of learned counsel for the parties, we have heard this appeal finally arid the same is being disposed of by this judgment. The short question involved in this appeal is as to how the q...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.