State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Vijay Vasantrao Deshpands
Judges: G T Nanavati, S Rajendra Babu Act Headnote
27 August, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:VIJAY VASANTRAO DESHPANDS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/08/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S. RAJENDRA BABU ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J A D G M E N T Nanavati. J.The State of Maharastr is challenging in this appeal the order passed by the Maharastra Administrati...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Orissa & Others vs Commissioner Of Land Records & Statement , Cuttack & Others
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
27 August, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF ORISSA & OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF LAND RECORDS & STATEMENT, CUTTACK & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/08/1998 BENCH:S.B. MAJMUDAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO.ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.JAGANNADHA RAO, J.J U D G M E N T The main point that arises for consideration in these appeals ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Vijay Vasantrao Deshpands
Judges: G T Nanavati, S Rajendra Babu Act Headnote
27 August, 1998·PETITIONER:HARNEK SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS DATE OF JUDGMENT09/12/1981 BENCH:KOSHAL, A.D. BENCH:KOSHAL, A.D. SEN, A.P. (J) ERADI, V. BALAKRISHNA (J) CITATION:1982 SCC (1) 116 ACT:Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act 1974, S. 3(1)-Detention orde...
Supreme Court Of India
Sadhan Chandra Dey And Ors vs Uoi And Ora
Judges: G T Nanavati, S Rajendra Babu Act Headnote
27 August, 1998·PETITIONER:SADHAN CHANDRA DEY AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:UOI AND ORA.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/08/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S.RAJENDRA BABU ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT Nanavati. J.The appellants were employed as Volunteers by the Eastern Railway to help the staff to check ticketless travel. They were pa...
Supreme Court Of India
Kala And Another vs Madho Parshad Vaidya
Judges: A S Anand, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
27 August, 1998·PETITIONER:KALA AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:MADHO PARSHAD VAIDYA.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/08/1998 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This is a tenant’s appeal by special leave. Respondent- landlord filed an eviction petition against the appellants under section 14 of the Hima...
Supreme Court Of India
Devram Bilve vs Indumati
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
27 August, 1998·1. Aggrieved by the decision of the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which hud dismissed the appellant's appeal and had upheld the decision of the Single Judge dismissing the appellant's divorce petition and granting the respondent's application for restoration of conjugal rights, th...
Supreme Court Of India
Billimora Nagar Palika vs Wood Polymer Ltd.
Judges: S Agrawal, S Kurdukar, S S Quadri
26 August, 1998·1. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated 21-11-1980/28-11-1980 in Special Civil Application No, 1379 of 1977 filed by M/s. Wood Polymer Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the petitioner").2. The petitioner was engaged in the manufacture of laminated sheets in...
Supreme Court Of India
Patel Valmik Himatlal And Others vs Patel Mohanlal Muljibhai ( Dead ) Through L Rs
Judges: A S Anand, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
26 August, 1998·PETITIONER:PATEL VALMIK HIMATLAL AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:PATEL MOHANLAL MULJIBHAI (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/08/1998 BENCH:A.S. ANAND, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Appellant-landlord filed a suit for recovery of a shop situate at Lati Bazar in city of Bhavnagar whic...
Supreme Court Of India
Jangeer Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: M K Mukherjee, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
26 August, 1998·PETITIONER:JANGEER SINGH & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/08/1998 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:D.P. Wadhwa, J.J U D G M E N T Appellants jangeer Singh and Harbans Singh have filed this appeal against the judgment of the Division bench of the R...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhukar Vishwanath Munje vs Madhao And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
26 August, 1998·1. In the instant case, a suit had been filed by the appellant for possession in respect of a property which his de facto guardian, during the time when the appellant was a minor, had transferred. The case of the appellant was that such transfer was void ab initio being in contravention of Section 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.