State Of Rajasthan Etc , Gokula And Another vs Ram Bharosi & Ors , State Of Rajasthan
Judges: M K Mukherjee, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
12 August, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF RAJASTHAN ETC., GOKULA AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:RAM BHAROSI & ORS., STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/08/1998 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:present:THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1998 Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.K.Mukherjee Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa A...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Kumar Mallik vs Central Bureau Of Investigation
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
12 August, 1998·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:VIJAY KUMAR MALLIK Vs. RESPONDENT:CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/08/1998 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:NANAVATI, J.J U D G M E N T We have heard learned counsel for b...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M P & Ors vs M/S Indore Iron & Steel Mills Pvt Ltd
Judges: S P Bharucha, V N Khare Act Headnote
12 August, 1998·PETITIONER:STATE OF M.P. & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. INDORE IRON & STEEL MILLS PVT. LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/08/1998 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA, V.N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:WITH C.A. NO. 2306/1996, C.A. NO. 11871/1996 J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA, J.The order under appeal, of the High Court of Madhya Pra...
Supreme Court Of India
Asstt. Supdt. Of Post Offices And ... vs G. Mohan Nair
Judges: S V Manohar, G Pattanaik
12 August, 1998·1. The respondent at the material time was working as extra departmental delivery agent, Pallipuram Post Office in Kerala. With effect from 2-11-1988 he was put off duty because a disciplinary action was contemplated against him for not delivering 11 money orders, although he, thereafter, voluntaril...
Supreme Court Of India
Gopal Ram And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, S Agrawal, A Misra
12 August, 1998·ORDER M.M. Punchhi, C.J.I.1. On the death of Sita Bai, Respondent 10, a substitution application has been preferred by the appellants. But now their learned Counsel says that it is futile to pursue the application because she was a legal representative of one of the original respondents, Munshi Ram ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ranganathan And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
12 August, 1998·1. The writ petitions relate to the riots that took place in Karnataka in December 1991 consequent upon a State-called bandh. They seek various reliefs, particularly in regard to compensation to be paid to the victims of the riots. On 7-2-1996 when the writ petitions reached hearing, learned counsel...
Supreme Court Of India
Hmm Ltd. vs Director General, Monopolies and ...
Judges: S Bharucha, G Pattanaik
11 August, 1998·ORDER Bharucha, J.1. Under appeal is the judgment and order dated 11th May, 1989 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission"). It held that the appellants were guilty of an unfair trade practice within the meaning of The Monopolies...
Supreme Court Of India
H.M.M. Ltd vs Director General, Monopolies and ...
Judges: S P Barucha, C B Pattanaik
11 August, 1998·THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 1998.Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P. Bharucha Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.B. Pattanaik Ashok Desai, Sr. Adv., Ravinder Narain, Aditya Narain, Manish, Advs. For M/s.J.B.D. & Co., Advs. with for appellant A.S. Nambiar, Sr.Adv., C.B.Babu, P.Parmeswaran, Advs. with him for the Responde...
Supreme Court Of India
A.P.S.R.T.C vs State Transport Appellate ...
Judges: S C Agrawal, S Saghir Ahmad, M Srinivasan
11 August, 1998·J U D G M E N T S ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 21474 OF 1997 WITH C.A. Nos. 3716 to 3738 of 1998 & 3740 to 3742 of 1998 SLP (C) NOS. 547/98, 598/98, 1116/98, 1171/98. 1139/98, 1118/98, 1122/98, 1138/98, 1168/98, 1128/98, 1117/98, 1172/98, 1281/98, 1304/98, 1642/98, 1787/98, 1758...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Sarvodya Printing Press Fine Art ...
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
11 August, 1998·ORDER S.P. Bharucha and V.N. Khare, JJ.1. A Full Bench of the Bombay High Court See [1994] 93 STC 387 (Sarvodaya Printing Press v. State of Maharashtra). answered in the negative the following question referred to it under the provisions of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 :Whether, on the facts and c...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.