Mohan Breweries and Distilleries ... vs Commercial Tax Officer, Madras and ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, K T Thomas, V N Khare
09 September, 1997·THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P Bharucha Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.T. Thomas Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.N. Khare G.L. Sanghi, Sr.Adv., A.T.M. Sampath, Adv. with him for the appellants.V.R. Reddy, Sr. Adv., V.Krishnamurthi and T. Harish Kumar, Advs. with him for the Respondents....
Supreme Court Of India
Madru Singh And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: M M Punchhi, S P Kurdukar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
09 September, 1997·PETITIONER:MADRU SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1997 BENCH:M. M. PUNCHHI, S. P. KURDUKAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Punchhi Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.P. Kurdukar Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Jagannadha Rao H.M. S...
Supreme Court Of India
N C Das vs M A Mohsin & Anr
Judges: S P Bharucha, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
09 September, 1997·PETITIONER:N.C. DAS Vs.RESPONDENT:M.A. MOHSIN & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1997 BENCH:S. P. BHARUCHA, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This is a special Leave petition against an Order of the High Court at Patna declining to take proceedings in contempt against the respondents. T...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs Bhoja Poojari & Anr
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
09 September, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. RESPONDENT:BHOJA POOJARI & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/1997 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.T.Nanavati Hon’ble Mr,Justice S.P.Kurdukar Ms. Manjula Kulkarni, M.Veerappa, Advs. for...
Supreme Court Of India
Sales Tax Officer, New Delhi vs East India Hotels Ltd. And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, M J Rao
09 September, 1997·1. These appeals raise the same point of law and can be decided together. The brief facts that we give, relate to Civil Appeal No. 3798 of 1989.2. The relevant period with which we are concerned is Assessment Year 1972-73. In the course of its business, the first respondent served at its hotels food...
Supreme Court Of India
Ponnala Narsing Rao vs Nallolla Pantaiah And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, S V Manohar
09 September, 1997·1. We have heard learned advocates for the parties. Three main contentions were canvassed before us by learned counsel for the petitioner. Firstly, that the respondents' predecessor-in-interest who was admittedly protected tenant of the lands had orally surrendered his tenancy rights years back in 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Kala vs Deputy Director (Consolidation) ...
Judges: A S Anand, K Venkataswami
09 September, 1997·Present:Hon'ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Venkataswami A.P. Mohanty, Adv. for the Petitioner Ujjal Singh, K.P. Singh and Hassasin, R.C. Kaushik, Advs., for the Respondents.O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered: K. Vankataswami The petitioner Initially filed Int...
Supreme Court Of India
Indira vs Arumugam And Anr.
Judges: S Majmudar, S V Manohar
09 September, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the respective parties finally in this appeal and accordingly the appeal is being disposed of on merits. This appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff challenging the judgment rendered by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Kamal Murmu and Another vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: M M Punchhi, S P Kurdukar, M Jagannadha Rao
08 September, 1997·Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Punchhi Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P. Kurdukar Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Jagannadha Rao Uma Datta, Adv. for the appellants J.K. Das, Adv. for M/s. Sinha & Das, Advs. for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered:M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.Thi...
Supreme Court Of India
Divisional Forest Officer vs Presiding Officer And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, S Kurdukar
05 September, 1997·1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel.2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 11-11-1988 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No. 5039 of 1988 dismissing the writ petition of the appellant in limine.3. The appellant herein is the Divisional Forest Officer, Timb...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.