R Rajendran Nair vs State Of Kerala
Judges: M K Mukharjee, K T Thomas Act Headnote
14 October, 1997·PETITIONER:R. RAJENDRAN NAIR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/10/1997 BENCH:M.K. MUKHARJEE, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 14TH DAT OF OCTOBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.K. Mukherjee Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.T. Thomas M.F. Vinod, Adv. for the appellant Ms. Malini Po...
Supreme Court Of India
Treasure Holding Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs The Custodian and Ors.
Judges: V J S, S Majmudar, B Kirpal
13 October, 1997·1. The submission of Shri Jethmalani, learned counsel for the appellant, is that the meaning of the expression "any person has been involved in any offences" under Section 3, sub-section (2) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 even if of wide imp...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr. Jagannath Mishra vs C.B.I.
Judges: M Mukherjee, S Kurdukar, K Thomas
13 October, 1997·1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the facts that chargesheet has already been submitted against the appellant and that at present no further investigation in this case is in progress against him, we direct tha...
Supreme Court Of India
Amines and Plasticizers Ltd. And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Agrawal, S V Manohar
03 October, 1997·1. In these review petitions the respondents are seeking review of the orders dated 4-2-1997 passed in Civil Appeals Nos. 16885, 16890 and 16894 of 1996 filed by the Union of India whereby the said appeals have been allowed in accordance with the decision in Mafatlal Industries v. Union of India, . ...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Bimal Krishna Kundu & Anr
Judges: M K Mukherjee, K T Thomas Act Headnote
03 October, 1997·PETITIONER:THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT:BIMAL KRISHNA KUNDU & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/1997 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.J U D G M E N T Special leave granted.The State of Andhra Pradesh is very much aggreived by the order of a learned single j...
Supreme Court Of India
Rambilas & Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: M M Punchhi, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
03 October, 1997·PETITIONER:RAMBILAS & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/1997 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.P. KURDUKAR, J.J U D G M E N T The High Court as well as the Sessions Court by their concurrent judgments held the appellants in all these crimina...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab And Ors. vs Inder Singh And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, D Wadhwa
03 October, 1997·JUDGMENT D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. In this batch of appeals, it is the State of Punjab in the Police Department which is the appellant. There are in all 18 respondents. They were all enrolled as Constables in the Police Department and later deputed to the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gram Panchayat Kakran vs Addl Director Of Consolidation & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D P Wadhwa Act Headnote
03 October, 1997·PETITIONER:GRAM PANCHAYAT KAKRAN Vs. RESPONDENT:ADDL. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/1997 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, D.P. WADHWA ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:O R D E R THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V. Manohar Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P.Wadhwa R.K.Ka...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corpn Of Delhi vs Delhi Urban House Owners Welfare Assn
Judges: S C Agrawal, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
03 October, 1997·PETITIONER:MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF DELHI Vs. RESPONDENT:DELHI URBAN HOUSE OWNERS WELFARE ASSN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/1997 BENCH:S.C. AGRAWAL, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:PATTANAIK. J.Leave granted J U D G M E N T This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 18th Septem...
Supreme Court Of India
Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni ... vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: A S Anand, K Venkataswami
01 October, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami. J.Leave granted.Heard counsel for the parties.Aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter called the "Tribunal"), Allahabad Bench, dated January 8, 1996 in O.A.No. 1361/95. the present appeal is filed.In the view we propose to take, it ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.