Satya Pal Sikka And Ors. vs Amar Nath And Ors.
Judges: G Ray, G Pattanaik
20 October, 1997·1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The order impugned in this appeal is the direction of the High Court dated 1-11-1996 given in CMWP No. 15061 of 1996. The Allahabad High Court by the said impugned order remanded the appeal to the lower appellate court for reconsideration afte...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs B M Ashraf & Co
Judges: S C Kirpal, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
20 October, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. RESPONDENT:B.M. ASHRAF & CO.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/10/1997 BENCH:S. C. KIRPAL, B. N. KIRPAL ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:KIRPAL, J.J U D G M E N T The respondent is a registered dealer under the provisions of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as ’the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Baitullan and Anr vs State Of U.P
Judges: M M Punchhi, K Venkataswami
17 October, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami, J.This appeal is preferred under section 379 of the code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a double murder which took place at about 10.00 a.m. on 26.4.79. Seven accused, namely, Sirajul Haq, Abdulas, Anwar Ali, Zainul Abdin, Yunus, Haroon and Baitullah, were ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gyan Prakash vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: K Venkataswami, V N Khare
17 October, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami Aggrieved by the judgment of Delhi High Court in C.W.NO. 433/90 dated 2.4.1992, this appeal by special leave has been preferred.The appellant presently a member of Delhi Higher Judicial Service who presented his case both before the High Court and this Court in person...
Supreme Court Of India
Steel Authority Of India Ltd vs Shri Ambica Mills Ltd. and Ors
Judges: M M Punchhi, K Venkataswami
17 October, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Venkataswami J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the Division Becnh judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated 7.2.1985. Brief facts concerning the case are given below.The first respondent-company is engaged in the manufacture of steel tubes through its Ambica Tubes ...
Supreme Court Of India
Delhi Pradesh Registered Medical ... vs Delhi Admn. Director Of Health ...
Judges: G N Ray, G B Pattanaik
17 October, 1997·THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.N.Ray Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.B.Pattanaik O.P.Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mrs. Sona Khan, Moh. Sajid Arun Kaushal, Goodwill Indeevar, S.K.Mehta, D.Mehta, Fazlin Anam, Ms. Shobha Verma, R.C. Gubrele, Mrs. Sarla Chandra, K.R. Gupta, Vivek Sharma, and Ash...
Supreme Court Of India
Delhi Pradesh Registered Medical ... vs Delhi Admn. Director Of Health ...
Judges: G N Ray, G B Pattanaik
17 October, 1997·THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.N.Ray Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.B.Pattanaik O.P.Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mrs. Sona Khan, Moh. Sajid Arun Kaushal, Goodwill Indeevar, S.K.Mehta, D.Mehta, Fazlin Anam, Ms. Shobha Verma, R.C. Gubrele, Mrs. Sarla Chandra, K.R. Gupta, Vivek Sharma, and Ash...
Supreme Court Of India
Board Of Trustees Port Of Mumbai vs Transworld Shipping Service (I) ...
Judges: S Sen, K Thomas
17 October, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The interim order of the Bombay High Court in these cases are set aside. The containers are lying in the port area for a very long time. In some cases, it has been stated that the containers are lying for as many as four years. It has further been stated that the consignees are u...
Supreme Court Of India
Sail Singh State Of Punjab vs Mohinder Pal
Judges: G T Nanavati, M Jagannadha Rao
17 October, 1997·J U D G M E N T M. JAGANNADHA RAO. J Criminal appeal No. 738 of 1983 is preferred by the informant Sail Singh questing the judgment of the High Court in so far as the High Court set aside the judgment of the learned sessions Judge and acquitted Mohinder Pal. Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 1983 is by the...
Supreme Court Of India
Konark Investments Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
17 October, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. On 11-6-1984 a company application (Company Application No. 99 of 1984) was presented before the High Court at Calcutta under Sections 391 and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956, for convening meetings to approve a Scheme of Arrangement between the appellant and Hari Brothers Pvt. Lt...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.