State Of U P vs Bhoora & Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare Act Headnote
23 October, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P.Vs. RESPONDENT:BHOORA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/10/1997 BENCH:G.T. NANAVATI, V.N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.T.Nanavati Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.N.Khare T.N.Singh, Adv. for the appellant T. Vasandhi, Adv. (A.C.) for...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Bhoora & Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare Act Headnote
23 October, 1997·PETITIONER:GAURAV JAIN Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT15/11/1989 BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH BENCH:MISRA RANGNATH VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) SAWANT, P.B.CITATION:1990 AIR 292 1989 SCR Supl. (2) 173 1990 SCC Supl. 709 JT 1989 (4) 315 1989 SCALE (2)1126 ACT:Constitution of Indi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of T.N. And Anr. vs Sun Paper Mills And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, S Sen
23 October, 1997·1. On 12-11-1965, the appellant issued a notification under the provisions of Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, directing that the rate of sales tax on the sale of white printing paper to newspaper concerns in the course of inter-Slate trade or commerce should be calculated at the rat...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ...
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
22 October, 1997·Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.B.Majmudar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jagannadha Rao N.N. Goswami, K.L. Shukla, H.L. Agrawal, M.L. Jain, Sr. Advs., Praveen Swarup, Satpal Singh, S. Wasim A. Qadri, P. Parmeswaran, Rajiv Sharma, K.K. Dhawan, K.S. Rana, Hemant Sharma, Y.P. Mahajan, A.D.N. Rao, A.K. Sharma, Raji...
Supreme Court Of India
Haricharan and Anr vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare
22 October, 1997·THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.T. Nanavati Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.N. Khare Kailash Vasdev, Adv. for the appellants. K.S. Bhati, Adv. for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: Nanavati, J.The two appellants, along with two others...
Supreme Court Of India
Lekhraj @ Harisingh vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare
22 October, 1997·THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr.Justive G.T. Nanavti Hon'ble Mr.Justive V.N. Khare S. Kulshreshtha, Adv. for the appellant Mrs. H.Wahi, Adv. for the Respondent J U D G E M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered: NANAVATI, J.This appeal arises out of the judgment of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Raju @ Rajendrarajya A Alias Raju vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M K Mukherjee, K T Thomas
22 October, 1997·WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 695 OF 1997 J U D G M E N T MUKHERJEE, J.These two appeals, filed under Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, are directed against the judgment and order dated August 16, 1991 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No...
Supreme Court Of India
Icici Ltd. vs East Coast Boat Builders and ...
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
21 October, 1997·1. Ms Suruchi Aggarwal is discharged from appearing for the respondent. Mr Rajesh Kumar has filed vakalatnama for the respondent.2. By our order dated 10-7-1997 while issuing notice in this SLP it was directed to be placed for final disposal at notice stage itself on a non-miscellaneous day. Accordi...
Supreme Court Of India
Sudhir Samanna vs State Of West Bengal and Another
Judges: G T Nanavati, M Jaganndha Rao
21 October, 1997·WITH (CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 297 & 298 OF 1987) J U D G M E N T M. JAGANNADHA RAO. J These three Appeals arise out of the Judgment of the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal appeal No. 159 of 1982 date 21.2.1986. BY that judgment, the conviction and sentence of eight accused, has been confirmed. Aggrie...
Supreme Court Of India
R. Pandian And Anothera. ... vs State Of Tamil Naduthrough The ...
Judges: G N Ray, G B Pattanaik
21 October, 1997·Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.N.Ray Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.B.Pattanaik S. Muralidhar and Ms. Neery Vaid, Advs. for the appellants R. Mohan, Sr. Adv., V.G. Pragasam, Adv. with him for the Respondents J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered:with CRIMINAR APPEAL NO.988 OF 1997 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.