Union Carbide Corpn. Ltd. vs Union Of India and Ors.
Judges: G Nanavati, G Pattanaik
11 November, 1997·ORDER I.A. Nos. 28-291. These applications are ordered to be listed along with Writ Petition (C) No. 66/96.I.A. Nos. 30-312. Learned counsel Mr. Dushyant Dave appearing in these applications for the applicants states that in view of the earlier orders passed by this Court these applications have bec...
Supreme Court Of India
Vishweshwaraiah Iron & Steel Ltd vs Abdul Gani & Ors
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
11 November, 1997·PETITIONER:VISHWESHWARAIAH IRON & STEEL LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:ABDUL GANI & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/11/1997 BENCH:S.B. MAJMUDAR, M. JAGANNADHA RAO ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.b.Majmudar Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Jagannadha Rao Dhruv Mehta, G.M. Misra, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. And ... vs Executive Officer And Anr.
Judges: M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
11 November, 1997·ORDER CA No. 4207 of 19921. The appellant Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, is aggrieved against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in having explained away and deviated from its earlier decision in Lalji Mulji v. State of Maharashtra, (1965) 67 Bom LR 484 .2. Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Syed Sadique And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar
Judges: S Sen, K Venkataswami
11 November, 1997·1. The assessment years involved are 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966-67.2. The following question of law was referred to the Patna High Court by the Tribunal: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income from the house property falls for inclusion in the total income of the asses...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr. Upendra Baxi vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal, V Khare
11 November, 1997·1. By order dated 29-4-1991, this Court had disposed of this matter and directed the learned District Judge of Agra to continue to monitor the affairs of the Agra Protective Home and give the necessary directions from time to time, as may be required for this purpose in addition to sending periodica...
Supreme Court Of India
P.V. Subba Naidu And Ors. vs Government Of A.P. And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, D Wadhwa
11 November, 1997·1. All these appeals pertain to the scope of the arbitration clause under the two contracts entered into by the State of Andhra Pradesh, one with the appellant in CAs Nos. 4617-18 of 1990 and the other with the appellant in CAs Nos. 3933-34 of 1990, Both these contracts contain an arbitration clause...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India And Ors vs Tata Engineering And Locomotive ...
Judges: Suhas C Sen, M Jagannadha Rao
10 November, 1997·JUDGMENT ORDER 1997 Supp(5) SCR 109 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave granted.Union of India has come up in appeal against the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court directing the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Jamshedpur, to pass without delay a...
Supreme Court Of India
Kashi Ram Namdeo Zambro vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: J Verma, G Nanavati, B Kirpal
10 November, 1997·1. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant-State of Maharashtra is that the judgment dated 31-10-1995 of this Court in Kashi Ram Namdeo Zambro v. State of Maharashtra is being misunderstood by the courts to mean that the same overrides the effect of Article 15 of Schedule I of the Bombay...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt Omwati Etc vs Mahendra Singh & Ors
Judges: M M Punchhi, M Srinivasan Act Headnote
07 November, 1997·PETITIONER:SMT. OMWATI ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/1997 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, M. SRINIVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997 Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M.Punchhi Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.Srinivasan K.B.Sinha, Sr. Adv., Ashok Kumar Sharma and H.S...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Atul Products Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
07 November, 1997·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. The notice on the SLP stated that it was limited to Question 4 and that the matter might be disposed of at the SLP stage by remanding to the High Court the consideration of that question. The respondent has been served but has not chosen to put in an app...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.