C.S. Joshi vs Indian Institute Of Technology, ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas
21 March, 1997·JUDGMENT K. Ramaswamy and K.T. Thomas, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, made on March 29, 1996 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8106/86.3. The appellant, while working as Lower Division Clerk, is sai...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Premier Fabricators, ... vs Heavy Engineering Corpn. ...
Judges: Cji, K Ramaswamy
21 March, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy, J.We have the advantage to read the proposed judgment by our esteemed brother Punchhi, J. Despite our deep and abiding personal respects, we express our regards for our inability to agree with the proposed judgment. Hence we are constrained to right this separate judgme...
Supreme Court Of India
Palam Vihar Residents ... vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: G Ray, G Pattanaik
21 March, 1997·1. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and hearing Mr Harish N. Salve, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Palam Vihar Residents Association and Dr Singhvi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the State of Haryana, it appears to us that the area in questio...
Supreme Court Of India
The Himachal Road ... vs Shri Kewal Krishan
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas
21 March, 1997·O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Shimla made on August 12, 1996 in TA No. 755/86. The respondent-conductor was found to have not issued the tickets to ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Fishery Officers Association,West Bengal & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas Act Headnote
21 March, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE FISHERY OFFICERS ASSOCIATION,WEST BENGAL & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This special leave petition arises from the order of the Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta, made on...
Supreme Court Of India
The Himachal Road Transportcorporation & Anr vs Shri Kewal Krishan
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas Act Headnote
21 March, 1997·PETITIONER:THE HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:SHRI KEWAL KRISHAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment an...
Supreme Court Of India
The Secretary To Government & Anr vs K Munniappan
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas Act Headnote
21 March, 1997·PETITIONER:THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:K. MUNNIAPPAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Delay condoned.O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the...
Supreme Court Of India
C S Joshi vs Iit , Kanpur & Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, K T Thomas Act Headnote
21 March, 1997·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:C.S. JOSHI Vs. RESPONDENT:IIT, KANPUR & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the lea...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Digvijay Cement Co , Etc vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors , Etc
Judges: Cji, G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar Act Headnote
21 March, 1997·PETITIONER:SHRI DIGVIJAY CEMENT CO., ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS., ETC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/1997 BENCH:CJI, G.T. NANAVATI, S.P. KURDUKAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:(With Civil Appeal Nos. 2146 to 2149 of 1997 arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 4734, 5036, 5070 and 8087 of 1995) J U D G M E N...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Premier Fabricators, ... vs Heavy Engineering Corpn. ...
Judges: Madan Mohan Punchi
21 March, 1997·J U D G M E N T Punchhi, J.The sole and subtle question arising in this appeal is whether in the facts and circumstances, it was required of the Umpire making the award to formally express in terms that items nos.2 to 5 of the dispute were arbitrable on the terms of the contract?The appellant herein...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.