Chief Inspector Of Stamps vs Indu Prabha Vachaspati (Smt) And ...
Judges: S V Manohar, M J Rao
22 July, 1997·1. This is a cross-appeal filed by the Chief inspector of Stamps in respect of a judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 10-4-1979 in CR No. 559 of 1972. The appeal filed by the respondent in respect of the same judgment regarding valuation, on a question which was decided against her by the H...
Supreme Court Of India
H.M. Bags Manufacturer vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
22 July, 1997·1. Leave granted in SLP (Civil) No. 19363 of 1995.2. The only contention of learned Counsel for the appellant is that a trade notice No. 29 was issued by the Board on 5-11-1992 notifying the reclassification and it is this date i.e. 5-11-1992 which is material and the demand in the present case coul...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of City vs Shivshanker Gaurishanker Mehta ...
Judges: S Majmudar, D Wadhwa
22 July, 1997·1. These appeals arise out of a common judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat pursuant to reference of two constitutional points for decision of the High Court. The reference was made by the City Civil Court Judge in a group of civil suits pending before him. Reference ob...
Supreme Court Of India
Gtc Industries Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise, New ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, V N Khare
22 July, 1997·J U D G M E N T THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. P. Bharucha Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. N. Khare J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered:S.P. BHARUCHA, J.The assessee is in appeal against an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Trib...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Western India Plywood
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
22 July, 1997·1. The only question raised for consideration in this appeal relates to the assessee/respondent's claim for refund of the amount of Rs. 7,18,671.55 out of the total amount of Rs. 12,54,827.05 paid as duty under Tariff Item No. 16-B in respect of flush doOrs. The question of classification of the goo...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaspal Singh Arora vs State Of M.P. And Ors.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
21 July, 1997·1. The election of the petitioner Jaspal Singh Arora as President of the Municipal Council, Sehore was challenged by a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by one Mahesh Chourasia who was a defeated candidate at the election. That writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr. D.C. Saxena vs Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Of India
Judges: K Ramaswamy
19 July, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy, J.In a clash of competing interests in constitutional contours, this case calls to strike a balance between the freedom of speech and expression, a salutary right in a liberal democratic society and paramount countervailing duty to maintain public confidence in the admi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of JandK vs Pirzada Ghulam Nabi
Judges: S V Manohar, D Wadhwa
17 July, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The respondent was retired on superannuation with effect from 31-5-1984. The order of his retirement was issued on 4-5-1984, He, however, immediately filed a writ petition before the High Court and obtained an interim order staying retirement on 21-5-1984. In the writ petition, a...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Nazmunnisa And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
17 July, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The appeal is taken up for final hearing. The respondents were issued notices in the special leave petition with a clear indication therein that the matter will be finally disposed of at the notice stage itself. Notices issued to them by order of 11-7-1995 have still not been rec...
Supreme Court Of India
Amar Nath vs State Of Haryana And Anr.
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
17 July, 1997·ORDER In this SLP a strong reliance is placed on a decision of a three-Judge Bench of this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner in Siri Ram v. State of Haryana, (1998) 2 SCC at 687. We are told that therein the view taken is that even though the claimant restricted his claim before the trial ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.