Khattar Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs, Calcutta
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
23 July, 1997·1. The question that falls for consideration in this appeal relates to the applicability of the Notifications No. 439/86 and No. 440/86, dated October 6, 1986 whereby partial exemption admissible in respect of basic customs duty and auxiliary customs duty on wood and articles of wood falling under H...
Supreme Court Of India
Usha Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors.
Judges: S V Manohar, M J Rao
23 July, 1997·1. IA No. 2 of 1996 in CA No. 10245 of 1996 filed by Smt Kiran Sinha is allowed and she is added as a party appellant in CA No. 10245 of 1996. The learned counsel for the parties have no objection to this order being passed.2. Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 20237 of 1996.3. In the impugned judgment of...
Supreme Court Of India
Nandkumar Krishnarao Navgire vs Jananath Laxman Kushalkar And ...
Judges: M Punchhi, K Venkataswami
23 July, 1997·1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay declining to upset an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, whereby notice issued against the complainant-respondent under Section 250 of the CrP...
Supreme Court Of India
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation vs Virendra Kumar Jayantibhai ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, V N Khare
23 July, 1997·J U D G M E N T V.N.KHARE, J.The appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) is established and constituted under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). One of the duties assigned to the Corporation under the Act is to provide medical service to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Vee Kay Industries vs Collector Of Central Excise, New ...
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
23 July, 1997·JUDGMENT J.S. Verma, C.J., and B.N. Kirpal, J.1. Learned Counsel for the appellant M/s. Vee Kay Industries submitted that a Special Bench of five members of Central Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) has considered the same question and taken the view in favour of the assessee that e...
Supreme Court Of India
J.C. Mills Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
23 July, 1997·ORDER This appeal relates to refund of excise duty on cotton/cellulose spun yarn manufactured in the mills of the appellant, which is a composite mill manufacturing yarn as well as fabric. Excise duty was paid by the appellant on the yarn manufactured between the period 18-6-1977 and 15-7-1977 which...
Supreme Court Of India
E S I Corporation & Anr vs P K Srinivasmurthy & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
23 July, 1997·PETITIONER:E.S.I. CORPORATION & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:P.K. SRINIVASMURTHY & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/07/1997 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, G.B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar,J.This is an appeal filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation against the judgmen...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhu Bala vs Suresh Kumar
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
23 July, 1997·PETITIONER:MADHU BALA Vs. RESPONDENT:SURESH KUMAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/07/1997 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, S. SAGHIR AHMAD ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.J U D G M E N T Special leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.On February 18, 1988 the appellant filed a complaint against...
Supreme Court Of India
Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. P. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: S Sen, S Kurdukar
23 July, 1997·1. This is a case of reopening. We have perused the documents. We find there was material on the basis of which the Income-tax Officer could proceed to reopen the case, it is not a case of mere change of opinion. We are not inclined to interfere with the decision of the High Court merely because the...
Supreme Court Of India
Govt Of Andhra Pradesh& Anr vs C Muralidhar
Judges: S C Agrawal, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
22 July, 1997·PETITIONER:GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH& ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:C. MURALIDHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/07/1997 BENCH:S.C. AGRAWAL, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:S.C. AGRAWAL, J. :-J U D G M E N T Special leave granted.C. Muralidhar, the respondent herein, was employed as Motor Vehicle Inspector with the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.