Rajesh Kumar & Anr vs The Institute Of Engineers ( India )
Judges: M M Punchhi, K Venkataswami Act Headnote
25 July, 1997·PETITIONER:RAJESH KUMAR & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS (INDIA) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/07/1997 BENCH:M. M. PUNCHHI, K. VENKATASWAMI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted O R D E R The two appellants, Rajesh Kumar and Harbir Singh appeared in the AIME Group ‘B’ examination conducted by ...
Supreme Court Of India
K Ajit Babu And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, V N Khare
25 July, 1997·J U D G M E N T V.N.KHARE J.The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the application filed by the appellants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985(hereinafter referred to as the Act) could be rejected by the Central Administrative Tribunal as no...
Supreme Court Of India
Common Cause, A Regd. Society, New ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
25 July, 1997·1. After passing of the order dated 9-5-1997 further affidavits have been filed on behalf of the Union of India as well as on behalf of the various State Governments and Union Territories. We have perused the same. We find that State Councils for Blood Transfusion have been set up in all the States ...
Supreme Court Of India
Califf India Chambers And Ors. vs Syndicate Bank, Kalamassery And ...
Judges: S Agrawal, G Nanavati
25 July, 1997·1. Special leave granted.2. The only question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the respondent, a nationalised scheduled Bank, is entitled to invoke the provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for the purpose of recovering the d...
Supreme Court Of India
Jacob Yahannanthe ... vs H.P. Vora and Ors
Judges: Cji, S P Kurdukar
24 July, 1997·WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1689 OF 1993 J U D G M E N T S.P. KURDUKAR, J.These two appeals by Special Leave arise out of the judgment and order dated 10th April, 1992 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal. Bombay Bench, Bombay in O.A. No. 558 of 1989 filed by H.P. Vora, the first respondent in both t...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Coimbatore Pioneer Fertilizers ...
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
24 July, 1997·1. The only question for decision in these appeals is whether pulverisation of rock phosphate amounts to a process of manufacture so as to make it exigible to duty in terms of Entry No. 14(HH) of the Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal has held that it is not a process o...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Customs, ... vs Hanuman Trading Corpn. And Anr.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
24 July, 1997·1. A total of 959.515 mts. of copper wire bars (electrolytic grade) at a total declared value of 5,08,58,131.05 CIF Calcutta was alleged to be grossly undervalued by the authority. The port of shipment of the goods as evident from the bills of entry was Rotterdam.2. Acting on information that the va...
Supreme Court Of India
Padmini Unni (Mrs) vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
24 July, 1997·1. A show-cause notice dated 6-10-1977 was issued to the appellant demanding duty for the period between 6-2-1969 and 16-4-1977. The duty was imposed on the basis that the goods were to be classified as pilfer-proof caps. It is clear from the facts that the assessee manufactured merely tab seals for...
Supreme Court Of India
South India Alloy Industries vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
24 July, 1997·1. From the Tribunal's order, it is clear that in some of the invoices recovered there was a specific endorsement that the price charged by the appellant was inclusive of the excise duty. There is no explanation by the appellant of this fact. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that there is...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Wealth ... vs K. N. Shanmughasundaram
Judges:
24 July, 1997·ORDER By the Court Civil Appeals, Nos. 1025-1033 of 1982 upon being mentioned taken on board.2. These appeals by certificate of fitness granted under section 261 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and under section 29 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, raise a common question for consideration and, therefore, t...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.