Mohan Dutt Sharma vs Chief Justice , Punjab & Haryana High Court
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, G B Pattanaik Act Headnote
30 July, 1997·PETITIONER:MOHAN DUTT SHARMA Vs. RESPONDENT:CHIEF JUSTICE, PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/07/1997 BENCH:SUJATA V. MANOHAR, G. B. PATTANAIK ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T The appellant joined the services of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana as a Clerk in the year 1966. ...
Supreme Court Of India
N.C.M. Ahmad Jamalia Beavi vs D. N. Shah
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, D D Wadhwa
30 July, 1997·J U D G M E N T D. P. Wadhwa, J.Leave granted.The appellant is landlady. She is aggriaved by the order dated July 9, 1994 of the Madras High Court granting yet further time to the respondent tenant for decositting rant in spite of persistent default committed by him in violation of the provision of ...
Supreme Court Of India
The Commonwealth Trust Ltd., ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: S C Agrawal, D P Wadhwa
30 July, 1997·WITH CIVIL APPEAL (N.T.) NO. 2979 OF 1982 J U D G M E N T D.P. Wadhwa, J.These two appeals by certificate under Section 261 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `the Act') are directed against the judgment dated November 27, 1981 of the Kerala High Court. The judgment is now reported in (1982) 135...
Supreme Court Of India
G. Dass and Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
29 July, 1997·1. The dispute in these cases is about the classification of the goods in question for the period between 1-3-1975 and 2-12-1975 and approval of the classification list dated 1-4-1976. There is no dispute that the same goods, namely, copper and brass round rods, copper and brass square and hexagonal...
Supreme Court Of India
Nylon Net Manufacturing Company vs Addl. Sales Tax Officer And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare
29 July, 1997·JUDGMENT S.P. Bharucha, J.1. Special leave in SLP (C) No. 1832 of 1991 granted.2. The order under appeal was made by a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala. The question for consideration was whether nylon fishing nets were, for the purposes of sales tax under the provisions of the Kerala Gene...
Supreme Court Of India
Telco Limited, Pune vs Collector Of Central Excise, Pune
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
29 July, 1997·ORDER Civil Appeals Nos. 11333-34 of 19951. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed.Civil Appeal No. 3375 of 19912. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out a circular being MF(DR) Circular No. 301/17/97-CX (F. No. 267/7/97-CX.8) dated 10-3-1997 by which Modvat credit has been given on inputs ...
Supreme Court Of India
National Rayon Corporation Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Suhas C Sen, K T Thomas
29 July, 1997·(WITH C.A NOS. 2/95, 198/89, 432/89, 433/89 AND 2970/81) J U D G M E N T SEN, J.The point that falls for determination in this case is whether a sum of Rs. 79 lakhs representing Debenture Redemption Reserve was includible in computing the capital of the assessee Company for the purpose of Companies ...
Supreme Court Of India
Executive Engineer, Workshop ... vs Collector Of Central Excise, Mor ...
Judges: S Agrawal, M J Rao
29 July, 1997·1. This appeal raises the question whether the claim for refund of excise duty made by the appellant was barred by limitation under Section 11-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The appellant is invoking the second proviso to sub-section (1) of Sectio...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Partap Steel Rolling Mills
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
29 July, 1997·1. These appeals are against the decision of the Tribunal. We find that the requisite facts on the basis of which the controversy between the parties relating to exigibility of the goods to excise duty arose have not been recorded either by the Tribunal or any of the authorities below it. It is appr...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) vs J.J. Electricals And Anr.
Judges: S Agrawal, M J Rao
29 July, 1997·1. Both these appeals are directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 22-7-1994 in the writ petitions filed by the respondents wherein the validity of Notification No. 223 dated 22-9-1987 was challenged. By the said notification, amendment had been made in Notification No. 175 of...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.