Gian Chand Goel vs Bar Council Of India And Anr.
Judges: S Agrawal, S V Manohar
07 January, 1997·1. This appeal has been filed under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The appellant is an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana. A complaint was made against the appellant before the State Bar Council by Respondent 2, Abdul Satar, relating to a civil suit filed by the com...
Supreme Court Of India
National Organic Chemical ... vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S P Bharucha, K Venkataswami
06 January, 1997·J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA, J.The proper construction of the word "derived from" will determine this appeal against a judgment and order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.The appellants are a refinery, recognised to be such by the Union of India. They manufacture ethylene, but...
Supreme Court Of India
Sitaramacharya ( Dead ) Through L Rs vs Gururajacharya ( Dead ) Through L Rs
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
06 January, 1997·PETITIONER:SITARAMACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.Vs. RESPONDENT:GURURAJACHARYA (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the jud...
Supreme Court Of India
Director , Elementary Education & Ors vs Pratap Kumar Nayak
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
06 January, 1997·PETITIONER:DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:PRATAP KUMAR NAYAK DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R We have heard learned counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the order dated 15.1.1...
Supreme Court Of India
T L Muddukrishana & Anr vs Smt Lalitha Ramchandra Rao
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
06 January, 1997·PETITIONER: T.L.MUDDUKRISHANA & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:SMT.LALITHA RAMCHANDRA RAO DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Present:THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.T.Nanavati G.V. Chandrasekhar, Adv. For P.P.Si...
Supreme Court Of India
M L Mubarak Basha & Ors vs Muni Naidu
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
06 January, 1997·PETITIONER:M. L. MUBARAK BASHA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:MUNI NAIDU DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/01/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Leave granted.O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties.This appeal by special leave arises from the Division Bench judgment of the Madras H...
Supreme Court Of India
Food Corporation Of India Etc. Etc vs State Of Kerala
Judges: Cji, Sujata V Manohar, K Venkataswami
06 January, 1997·THE 6 AND 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 Present:Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V.Manohar Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Venkataswami D.D. Thakur, B.D. Agarwal, A.S. Nambiar, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, H.L. Aggarwal, U.N. Bachawat, A.N. Jayaram, H.N. Salve, O.P.Rana, Sr. Advs., (A.K. Verma, P.D. Ty...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhukar Jetly vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Ahmadi, S V Manohar, K Venkataswami
06 January, 1997·1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Attorney General, who drew our attention to the decision of this Court in Pashupati Nath Sukul v. Nem Chandra Jain . In that case two questions were raised for consideration and one of them was whether a person elected as a m...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaishree Banerjee (Smt) vs Abhirup Banerjee
Judges: A Anand, F Uddin
06 January, 1997·1. The petitioner is the wife against whom a matrimonial case, HMA No, 489 of 1996, has been filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. That case is pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi, The petitioner seeks transfer of that case fro...
Supreme Court Of India
The Board Of Management Of ... vs A. Raghupathy Bhat and Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
03 January, 1997·O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard counsel on both sides.This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Karnataka High Court, made on 18.4.1996 in C.R.P. Nos. 934/93 and 2362/93 and the order dated 5.8.1996 in C.P. Nos. 365 and 366 of 1996.The admitted position is that the respondent w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.