Ahmedabad Women Action Group ... vs Union Of India
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, K Venkataswami
24 February, 1997·J U D G M E N T VENKATASWAMI. J.All these Writ Petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation. In W.P. (C) No. 494/96. the reliefs prayed foe are as follows :(a) to declare muslim Personal Law which allows ploygamy as void as offending Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution;(b) to declare Muslim ...
Supreme Court Of India
Goodyear India Ltd. Vs. ... vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: A A I, M S Manohar, K Thomas
24 February, 1997·ORDER K.T. Thomas, J.1. The question involved in this appeal is whether tyres of the size 1800 and above manufactured for fitment to heavy moving vehicles such as dumpers and earth movers are exigible to excise duty as "tyres for motor vehicles". This appeal by special leave is in challenge of the o...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Railway Permanent Way Inspectors Association & Anr vs The Union Of India & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
24 February, 1997·PETITIONER:INDIAN RAILWAY PERMANENT WAY INSPECTORS ASSOCIATION & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/02/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This special leave petition arises from the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madr...
Supreme Court Of India
Laxmi Narain Mehar vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
24 February, 1997·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:LAXMI NARAIN MEHAR Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/02/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R The petitioner was transferred from Kota to Mumbai on the adminis...
Supreme Court Of India
Mst Bhabia Devi vs Permanand Pd Yadav
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
24 February, 1997·PETITIONER:MST. BHABIA DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT:PERMANAND PD. YADAV DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/02/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This special leave petition arises from the order of the High Court of Patna, made in Appeal from the Original Order No.406/86 on July 24, 1...
Supreme Court Of India
Bombay Tyres International Ltd vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, K T Thomas
24 February, 1997·(with S.L.P. (C) No. 6236/1979) J U D G M E N T Thomas.J.In view of Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 640 of 1979 the Transferred Case as also the Special Leave Petition are disposed of in terms thereof....
Supreme Court Of India
M. Hara Bhupal vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
24 February, 1997·JUDGMENT 1997(2) SCR 455 ORDER The following Order of the Court was delivered :This special leave petition arises from the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, made on December 24, 1996 in O.A. No. 1333/95.The admitted position is that the petitioner, while working as Section ...
Supreme Court Of India
Braj Kishore Thakur vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Madan Mohan Punchhi, K T Thomas
24 February, 1997·JUDGMENT 1997(2) SCR 420 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by THOMAS, J. Leave granted.Judicial restraint is a virtue. A virtue which shall be concommitant of every judicial disposition. It is an attribute of a judge which he is obliged to keep refurbished time to time, particularly while deal...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Punjab And Anr. vs Satish Kumar Duggal And Ors.
Judges: S Agrawal, S S Ahmad
24 February, 1997·1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 16-5-1994 allowing the writ petition (CWP No. 3510 of 1993) filed by the respondents. The respondents are employed as Lecturers and Librarians in Guru Gobind Singh Kh...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Dr. Jagdishwar Bhat
Judges: G Ray, G Pattanaik
24 February, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties;3. The short question which arises for our consideration is whether the respondent who is a retired Medical Officer of the Railway is entitled to Complimentary Passes. Such claim of the respondent was not accepted by the Railway Administratio...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.