V.P. Kumaravelu vs The Bar Council Of India,New Delhi ...
Judges: S C Agrawal, Sujata V Manohar
04 February, 1997·THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.C. Agrawal Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sujata V. Manohar A.T.M. Sampath and V. Balaji, Advs. for the appellant A. Mariarputham and Ms. Aruna Mathur and V.Krishnamurthy, Advs. for the Respondent Nos. 2-3 J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of th...
Supreme Court Of India
R.S.E.B.Accountants ... vs Rajasthan State Electricity ...
Judges: S C Agrawal, G B Pattanaik
04 February, 1997·J U D G E M E N T S.C AGRAWAL, J.The question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether Entry 19 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan State Electricity Board Officers [Recruitment, Promotion & Seniority] Regulations, 1974(hereinafter referred to as 'The 1974 Regulations') is violative of th...
Supreme Court Of India
West Coast Paper Mills vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S Sen, B Kirpal
04 February, 1997·1. It is the case of the appellant that the appellant was guided by the trade notice issued by the Poona Collectorate and did not, therefore, apply for relief under Rule 56A(1) as it stood at the material time. That is the reason why the appellant did not claim any benefit of relief about payment of...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Siwakami Mills Ltd.
Judges: K Paripoornan, S Majmudar
04 February, 1997·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The short question that arises for our consideration in this appeal is whether the guarantee commission paid by the assessee is a revenue expenditure and hence allowable as deduction in computing the total income in the assessment year 1968-69. The High Co...
Supreme Court Of India
The Government Of Tamil Nadu and Anr vs K. Jayaraman
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
03 February, 1997·O R D E R Leave granted.We have heard learned counsel for the parties. When the respondent failed to be represented pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, we requested the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee to assign the counsel. Accordingly, Smt. K. Sarda Devi has been assigned the case.T...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. and Ors vs Committee Of Management ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
03 February, 1997·O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard counsel on both sides. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, made on September 7, 1994 in Special Appeal No. 131/93.The Division Bench by the impugned order has directed the Inspector of Schools...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohmoodkhan Mahboobkhan Pathan vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: Madan Mohan Punchhi, K T Thomas Act Headnote
03 February, 1997·PETITIONER:MOHMOODKHAN MAHBOOBKHAN PATHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1997 BENCH:MADAN MOHAN PUNCHHI, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:THOMAS. J.J U D G M E N T Appellant was a Sub-Register in the Registration Department under Maharashtra Government. The Special j...
Supreme Court Of India
Board Of Management Of S.V.T. ... vs A. Raghupathy Bhat And Others
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G Nanavati
03 February, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard counsel on both sides.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Karnataka High Court, made on 18-4-1996 in C.R.P. Nos. 934/93 and 2362/93 and the order dated 5-8-1996 in C. P. Nos. 365 and 366 of 1996.4. The admitted position is that the responden...
Supreme Court Of India
Amitabh Kumar And Anr vs Director Of Estates And Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
03 February, 1997·JUDGMENT 1997 (1) SCR 854 ORDER The following Order of the Court was delivered :Delay condoned.The second petitioner, admittedly, has retired from service. Before his retirement, the first petitioner, his son had applied for allotment of the house in substitution of the father. Undoubtedly, the allo...
Supreme Court Of India
K.I. Pavunny vs Assistant Collector (Head ...
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S Saghir Ahmad, G B Pattanaik
03 February, 1997·J U D G M E N T K. Ramaswamy, J.This appeal by special leave has come up before this Bench, pursuant to a reference order dated November 9, 1994 passed by a two-Judge Bench, to consider whether the confessional statement of the appellant given to the Customs officers under Section 108 of the Customs...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.