Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Orient Steel and Industries Ltd., ...
Judges: S Sen, S V Manohar
18 February, 1997·1. The question that falls for determination in this case is whether the Board could in exercise of the power under Section 35E(1) call for and examine the record of an order passed by the Collector in revision, under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal has come to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Anmol Trading Corpn. Ltd. And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, S Majmudar
18 February, 1997·1. The order of the High Court directed refund of excise duty. It did so because of an order of the Tribunal, the appeal against which has been dismissed by this Court. The order of the High Court Directing refund was honoured by the appellants on 27th March, 1991, that is to say, well before the am...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Indian Hydraulic Industries, New ...
Judges: S Bharucha, S Majmudar
18 February, 1997·ORDER S.P. Bharucha and S.B. Majmudar, JJ.1. It was found as a fact that the respondents fit, part by part, specialised equipment on to a motor vehicle chassis so as to produce the sort of specialised motor vehicle that is commonly seen at airports and the like. Finding that the specialised equipmen...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs K.T. Doctor
Judges: B J Reddy, K Paripoornan
18 February, 1997·1. We find that there is no discussion about the plea of device in the judgment of the Tribunal, though, it is true, that the appeals before the Tribunal were by the assessee. We also find that even in the judgment of the High Court, this aspect does not seem to have been argued or dealt with. In th...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Koron Business Systems Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, S Majmudar
18 February, 1997·1. We have read the judgment and order under appeal. We are of the view that the High Court was right in holding that plates and black shields are not parts of photocopying machines. No interference being called for, the appeal is dismissed.2. No order as to costs....
Supreme Court Of India
Tamilnadu Electricity Board vs M/S Bridge Tunnel Constructions & Ors
Judges: K Ramaswamy, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
18 February, 1997·PETITIONER:TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. BRIDGE TUNNEL CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/02/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, S. SAGHIR AHMAD ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Leave granted. Substitution allowed.These appeals, by special leave, arise from the judgment of the Madras...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajni Sehgal vs State Of JandK And Anr.
Judges: S Agrawal, S S Ahmad
17 February, 1997·1. Special leave granted.2. The appellant was posted as Officiating Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Reasi, Jammu. By order dated June 11,1996, passed by the Additional Director General of Prisons and Fire Services, Jammu, the appellant was placed under suspension. She filed a Writ Petition (S.W.P. No. 859...
Supreme Court Of India
Sadhvi Ritumbhara vs Digvijay Singh and Anr
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati
17 February, 1997·O R D E R Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on January 13, 1997, M. Gopal Reddy, IAS, the then Director of Public Relation & Information and Mangal Prasad Misra, then Assistant Director, Public Relation & Information appeared in person. They have filed their affidavits. This court by order ...
Supreme Court Of India
The New India Civil Erectors(P ) Ltd vs Oil & Natural Gas Corporation
Judges: B P Jeevan Reddy, Sujata V Manohar Act Headnote
17 February, 1997·PETITIONER:THE NEW INDIA CIVIL ERECTORS(P) LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/02/1997 BENCH:B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.Leave granted. Heard Shri F.S. Nariman, learned counsel for the appellant a...
Supreme Court Of India
The State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors vs A Gurusamy
Judges: K Ramaswamy, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
17 February, 1997·PETITIONER:THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:A. GURUSAMY.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/02/1997 BENCH:K. RAMASWAMY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties.This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the single J...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.