Mahesh Chand Bisht And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: J Verma, B Kirpal
15 December, 1997·1. The question whether the petitioners should be permitted to represent the cause which is brought in public interest would be decided on the petitioners furnishing full particulars on an affidavit of their concern and the purpose to agitate the same in the Court. The affidavit would be filed withi...
Supreme Court Of India
Badruddin Qureshi vs Prem Prakash Pandey And Ors.
Judges: S Sen, M J Rao
15 December, 1997·1. The Court dismissed the election petition on the ground that Form 25-C furnished by the petitioner was not verified by a Notary. The basis of the judgment appears to be an observation made in the judgment of this Court in the case of Shirpa (Dr) v. Shanti Lal Khoiwal, . It was a judgment delivere...
Supreme Court Of India
S.K. Sahana and Sons Ltd. And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: S Sen, S Quadri
12 December, 1997·1. This is an appeal against a decision of a Full Bench of the Patna High Court in respect of the Assessment Years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The question raised in this case came up for consideration earlier before a Division Bench of the Patna High Court in the case of CIT v. S.K. Sahana and So...
Supreme Court Of India
Sunil Kumar vs N.C.T. Of Delhi And Ors.
Judges: M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
12 December, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The High Court has quashed charge framed against the respondents under Sections 308/34 IPC and has sequels quashed proceedings against the respondents under Sections 323/34 IPC on the ground that the police could not have investigated the said offence without the permission of a ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of M.P. vs Harsh Gupta
Judges: M Mukharji, K Thomas
12 December, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. On a complaint lodged by the Divisional Forest Officer, Morena under Sections 5-C, 12, 12-A and 16 of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 and Sections 26 and 42 read with Section 41 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), ...
Supreme Court Of India
National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. vs Prem Prakash Jain
Judges: M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
12 December, 1997·1. The point arising in the instant SLP is whether mosaic disease which afflicted the tomato plants grown by the respondent in his fields, was due to seeds being contaminated or to other soil and climatic conditions. It is beyond dispute that a certain quantity of tomato seed was purchased by the re...
Supreme Court Of India
Leelabai (Smt) vs Rajaram And Anr.
Judges: M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
12 December, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. A minor's property was sold through his father as guardian. The father in reverse acting again as guardian filed a suit on behalf of the minor against the vendee for return of the property propounding a different nature as to the transaction. The suit was dismissed. An appeal was...
Supreme Court Of India
S. K. Sahana And Sons Ltd. And ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax.
Judges:
12 December, 1997·JUDGMENT This is an appeal against a decision of a Full Bench of the Patna High Court (see [1988] 169 ITR 617) in respect of the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The question raised in this case came up for consideration earlier before a Division Bench of the Patna High Court in the ca...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahendra Singh Chotelal Bhargad vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Judges: M K Mukherjee, K T Thomas Act Headnote
12 December, 1997·PETITIONER:MAHENDRA SINGH CHOTELAL BHARGAD Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/1997 BENCH:M.K. MUKHERJEE, K.T. THOMAS ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.J U D G M E N T For obtaining an illegal gratification of Rs. 3,000/- from Rajkumar Mohanram Sawani, (P.W.1) t...
Supreme Court Of India
The General Court Martial & Ors vs Col Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal
Judges: M M Punchhi, M Srinivasan Act Headnote
12 December, 1997·PETITIONER:THE GENERAL COURT MARTIAL & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:COL. ANILTEJ SINGH DHALIWAL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/1997 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, M. SRINIVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Srinivasan, J.J U D G M E N T The respondent was an Army Officer of the rank of Lt. Col. and was posted as Commanding Officer u...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.