H U D A & Anr vs Anil Sabharwal & Ors
Judges: B N Kirpal Act Headnote
05 December, 1997·PETITIONER:H.U.D.A. & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:ANIL SABHARWAL & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/1997 BENCH:B.N. KIRPAL ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:[ With I.A.Nos.4 & 5/97 in C.A.No. 8637/97 arising out of SLP (C) No. 11238/97 ] J U D G M E N T Verma, CJI Leave granted limited to the question indicated in our orde...
Supreme Court Of India
Donat Louis Machado And Ors. vs L. Ravindra And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, S Kurdukar
05 December, 1997·1. Leave granted. Though Respondents 1 and 2 are served, nobody has put in an appearance for them.2. The short question is as to what is the appropriate compensation payable to the claimants on account of the death of their breadwinner on whom they were depending. The claimants are the parents and s...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhaskaran Etc.Manoharan @ Babu vs State Of Kerala
Judges: M K Mukherjee, K T Thomas
05 December, 1997·THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.K. Mukherjee Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.T. Thomas B.C. Deepak and C.N. Sreekumar, Advs. for the appellants. K.M.K. Nair, Adv. for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered:WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 226 OF 19...
Supreme Court Of India
Dr Banwarilal Sharma vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, S Quadri
05 December, 1997·1. In the FIR registered against the petitioner on 28-7-1986 for an offence under Section 309 IPC, what is alleged is that the writ petitioner had undertaken a "fast unto death". The challenge to the registration of the FIR in the writ petition was primarily on the ground that Section 309 IPC, i.e.,...
Supreme Court Of India
Jain Spinners Led vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: Cji, B N Kirpal Act Headnote
05 December, 1997·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 PETITIONER:JAIN SPINNERS LED.Vs. RESPONDENT:COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/1997 BENCH:CJI, B.N. KIRPAL ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Verma, CJI.J U D G M E N T In the present case the fact that certified copy of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Malleable Iron and Steel Castings ...
Judges: S Sen, M Srinivasan
04 December, 1997·1. As many as five points fell for consideration before, the Tribunal in this case. The points are:"(i) Whether the goods in question would attract duty under Item 25 or whether the process of machining would take out a casting from TI 25 to TI 68;(ii) If the goods are classified under TI 68, whethe...
Supreme Court Of India
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Sunita Rathi and Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, A P Misra
04 December, 1997·THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P. Bharucha Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.P. Misra Jitender Sharma, Sr. Adv., and B.K. Pal, Adv. with him for the appellant Ashok K. Mahajan, Adv. (NP) for the Respondents.J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Cour...
Supreme Court Of India
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd vs Ongc Ltd. and Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha, S C Sen
04 December, 1997·THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.P.Bharucha Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.C.Sen Soli J.Sorabjee, Shanti Bhushan, B.Dutta, Milon K.Banerjee, Sr.Advs., P.H.Parekh, Amit Dhingra, Nikihil Shakharande, G.Joshi, G.khandpal, Virendra, G.K. Banerjee, Advs., with th...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Television and Components Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: S Sen, M Srinivasan
04 December, 1997·1. The dispute in this case is about the leviability of excise duty on a television set with the timer. The contention of the appellant before the Tribunal was that a television set attached with a timer is as same as a television set attached with a clock. The Tribunal has not accepted the contenti...
Supreme Court Of India
Tarak Nath Sing and Anr vs State Of West Bengal
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare
04 December, 1997·THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present:Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.T. Nanavati Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.N. Khare Rajinder Sachhar, Sr.Adv., R.P. Gupta, Adv. with him for the appellants.G.S. Chatterjee, Raja Chatterjee, (J.R.Das,) Adv for M/s. Sinha & Das, Advs. for the Respondent J U D G M E N T The following...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.