M/S. Yatindranath Shukla and Co, ... vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S C Sen, M Srinivasan
09 December, 1997·J U D G M E N T SRINIVASAN, J.These appeals are directed against the order of the Customs Excise & Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. Civil appeal Nos. 3030-31 of 1989 are by the assessee while the other appeals are by the Revenue. Two questions arise for consideration. One of them has alre...
Supreme Court Of India
Rashiklal and Co. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Judges: S Sen, S S Ahmad
09 December, 1997·JUDGMENT Suhas C. Sen, J.1. The following question of law was referred by the Tribunal to the Orissa High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 :"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the commission paid by the assessee-firm to Sri Rashiklal P. Rathor (individua...
Supreme Court Of India
Regional Provident Fund ... vs Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. ...
Judges: S Majmudar, M J Rao
09 December, 1997·1. In this appeal the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Union of India have brought in challenge the judgment and order rendered by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 1129 of 1980. It has been held by the learned Judge that the respondent-Chemical Compa...
Supreme Court Of India
Miss P. Sarada vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ...
Judges: Suhas C Sen, K Venkataswami
09 December, 1997·J U D G M E N T SEN,J.The appellant, Miss P. Sarada, is a major shareholder of Messers Universal Radiators Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Company"). It is a company in which public were not substantially interested. While completing the assessment of the appellant for the assessment year...
Supreme Court Of India
Devadoss (Dead) By Lrs. And Anr vs Veera Makali Amman Koil Athalur
Judges: S B Majmudar, M Jagannadha Rao
09 December, 1997·JUDGMENT 1997 Supp(6) SCR 282 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. Leave granted.This appeal has been preferred by the legal representative of one Dr, Devadoss against the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Special Tribunal Appeal No. 4 of 1993 dat...
Supreme Court Of India
Mst.Harkori vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: G T Nanavati, G R Pattanaik
09 December, 1997·J U D G M E N T Nanavati,J.In view of the consistent evidence of PWs 1 and 2 it was not possible for the learned counsel for the appellant to submit that the view taken by the High Court is unreasonable justifying for interference by this Court. Moreover, when leave was applied for by all the three ...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajendra Mahton vs State Of Bihar Thr. ...
Judges: M M Punchhi, M Srinivasan
09 December, 1997·J U D G M E N T Srinivasan, J.The appellant was prosecuted under Section 302 I.P.C. The case of the prosecution was briefly as follows: On April 21, 1981 at about 7.00 P.M. the appellant went to the shop belonging to the deceased Arjun Sao near his residence and demanded a packet of cigarette from P...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Yatindranath Shukla & Co , Kanpur Etc Etc vs Collector Of Central Excise , Kanpur Etc Etc
Judges: S C Sen, M Srinivasan Act Headnote
09 December, 1997·PETITIONER:M/S. YATINDRANATH SHUKLA & CO, KANPUR ETC. ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR ETC. ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/12/1997 BENCH:S.C. SEN, M. SRINIVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:SRINIVASAN, J.J U D G M E N T These appeals are directed against the order of the Customs Excise &...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajendra Mahton vs State Of Bihar Thr Legalremembrancer Govt Of Bihar , Patna
Judges: M M Punchhi, M Srinivasan Act Headnote
09 December, 1997·PETITIONER:RAJENDRA MAHTON Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR THR. LEGALREMEMBRANCER GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/12/1997 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, M. SRINIVASAN ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:Srinivasan, J.J U D G M E N T The appellant was prosecuted under Section 302 I.P.C. The case of the prosecution...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Bihar vs Ramnath Prasad & Ors
Judges: G T Nanavati, V N Khare Act Headnote
09 December, 1997·PETITIONER:RAM SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/07/1996 BENCH:RAMASWAMY, K. BENCH: RAMASWAMY, K.G.B. PATTANAIK (J) CITATION:1996 SCALE (5)567 ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:O R D E R This appeal by special leave arises against the order of the High Court of Allahabad m...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.