Vishwanath Shanthamallappa ... vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G T Nanavati, S P Kurdukar
12 August, 1997·J U D G M E N T NANAVATI, J This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 555 of 1980 whereby it confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 read with section 34 IPC recorded by the Sessions Judge, Bijapur in Session...
Supreme Court Of India
Cargo Boat and Steel Barge P. Welfare ... vs State Of A.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Sen, M J Rao
11 August, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. The grievance of the appellants is that they have valid licences but the High Court has put a time period for utilising those licences. Therefore, the direction of the High Court that the old operators shall be permitted to continue their respective operations for a period of six...
Supreme Court Of India
A.P. State Electricity Board And ... vs R. Parthasarathi And Others
Judges: G Ray, G Pattanaik
11 August, 1997·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether an employee to be eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer under Regulation 14 of the Service Regulation Act, the experience rendered in the...
Supreme Court Of India
D.C.M. Ltd vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi and ...
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, M Jagannadha Rao
08 August, 1997·[With C.A.Nos. 1270-1294/1987, 1298/1987, 4408/1995, 1300- 1303/1987 & 11765-11800/1995] J U D G M E N T Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.These appeals arise as a result of certain increases in fuel adjustment charges levied by the second respondent on the appellant and the resultant arbitration. The award...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Rukma and Ors vs Jala and Ors
Judges: G N Ray, G T Nanavati
08 August, 1997·J U D G M E N T NANAVATI, J.The widows of the three victims, who were alleged to have been murdered by respondent Nos. 1 to 8 (Accused 1 to8), have filed this appeal, by special leave of this Court, against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench) in B...
Supreme Court Of India
Tomy Jacob Kattikkaran vs Dr Thomas Manjaly & Anr
Judges: M K Mukherjee, S Saghir Ahmad Act Headnote
08 August, 1997·2. On February 12, 1990 the appellant filed a complaint against the respondent No. 1 (respondent’ for short) in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam alleging commission of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (’Act’ for short). The sum and substance of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Baleshwar Mandal And Another vs The State Of Bihar
Judges: M M Punchhi, V N Khare Act Headnote
08 August, 1997·PETITIONER:BALESHWAR MANDAL AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF BIHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1997 BENCH:M.M. PUNCHHI, V.N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:V.N.KHARE, J.J U D G M E NT By this appeal, the appellants, who have been found quilty for the offence under- Section 302 read with Section 34...
Supreme Court Of India
Hira Man vs State Of U P & Ors
Judges: S C Agrawal, G T Nanavati Act Headnote
08 August, 1997·PETITIONER: HIRA MAN Vs.RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P. & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1997 BENCH:S. C. AGRAWAL, G. T. NANAVATI ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:NANAVATI, J.Leave granted J U D G M E N T Heard learned counsel for both the sides The appellant was employed as a Daftari (Class IV employee) in Nehru Int...
Supreme Court Of India
Paiara Lal vs State Of Punjab & Anr
Judges: Sujata V Manohar, M Jagannadha Rao Act Headnote
08 August, 1997·1. Special leave granted. We have heard the counsel on both sides on the merits of the appeal.2. The appellant was appointed as a Constable in the Police Department of the erstwhile State of PEPSU (Patiala and East Punjab States union) which merged later on 1.11.1956 with the new State of Punjab. ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Bhagwan And Others
Judges: M M Punchhi, V N Khare Act Headnote
08 August, 1997·PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P.Vs. RESPONDENT:BHAGWAN AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1997 BENCH:M. M. PUNCHHI, V. N. KHARE ACT:HEADNOTE:JUDGMENT:KHARE, J.J U D G M E N T By the present appeals the appellant, State of U.P., questions the correctness of the judgment dated 27.2.1990 rendered by the High...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.